Andrew Pearson
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 1
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 1
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 3
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 1
- Co-authors
- Barry Kapik (2 shared papers)David S. Boyer (2 shared papers)Peter A. Campochiaro (2 shared papers)Frances Kane (2 shared papers)Amod Gupta (2 shared papers)David M. Brown (1 shared paper)Sanford Chen (1 shared paper)José M. Ruiz‐Moreno (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ophthalmology (2 papers)Ophthalmologica (1 paper)The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (1 paper)American Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Pearson
5 papers receiving 667 citations
Andrew Pearson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Ophthalmology 681
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 517
- Pharmaceutical Science 15
- Clinical Biochemistry 13
- Neurology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pearson. The network helps show where Andrew Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sustained Delivery Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Inserts Provide Benefit for at Least 3 Years in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 376 |
| 2 | 2011 | 288 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 1 |
About Andrew Pearson
Andrew Pearson is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (681 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (517 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (15 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (13 citations) and Neurology (12 citations). Andrew Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Barry Kapik, David S. Boyer, Peter A. Campochiaro, Frances Kane, Amod Gupta, David M. Brown, Sanford Chen, José M. Ruiz‐Moreno, Bruce R. Garretson and Seenu M. Hariprasad. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Ophthalmologica, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.