Andrew Pearson

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 708 citations indexed

About

Andrew Pearson is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Pearson has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 708 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 1 paper in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Pearson's work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). Andrew Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). Andrew Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Andrew Pearson's co-authors include Barry Kapik, Amod Gupta, Frances Kane, David S. Boyer, Peter A. Campochiaro, David M. Brown, Sanford Chen, Seenu M. Hariprasad, Elias Reichel and Bruce R. Garretson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Pearson

5 papers receiving 667 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Sustained Delivery Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Inserts Provide Benefit for at Least 3 Years in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

2012 376 citations Peter A. Campochiaro, David M. Brown et al. Ophthalmology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Pearson United States	4	681	517	65	26	15	5	708
Kunihiro Musashi Japan	7	378 0.6×	257 0.5×	51 0.8×	9 0.3×	10 0.7×	7	435
Shamika Gune United States	12	472 0.7×	433 0.8×	72 1.1×	20 0.8×	15 1.0×	35	501
María R. Sanabria Spain	12	392 0.6×	254 0.5×	85 1.3×	17 0.7×	7 0.5×	33	438
Hajime Bando Japan	9	295 0.4×	205 0.4×	66 1.0×	13 0.5×	3 0.2×	16	332
Emmerson Badaró Brazil	12	346 0.5×	286 0.6×	77 1.2×	9 0.3×	3 0.2×	37	399
Paolo Turchetti Italy	9	266 0.4×	214 0.4×	34 0.5×	31 1.2×	14 0.9×	23	343
Connie Chou United States	5	374 0.5×	156 0.3×	23 0.4×	75 2.9×	9 0.6×	8	398
Ricardo Lamy United States	8	201 0.3×	184 0.4×	42 0.6×	53 2.0×	3 0.2×	19	295
András Seres Hungary	9	339 0.5×	200 0.4×	38 0.6×	6 0.2×	2 0.1×	15	374
Jella An United States	10	360 0.5×	220 0.4×	17 0.3×	88 3.4×	13 0.9×	30	411

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pearson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pearson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pearson. The network helps show where Andrew Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Pearson. Andrew Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Pearson, Andrew, Nitin Malhotra, Michael A. Ferguson, et al.. (2025). Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Congenital Hyperinsulinism: A National User-satisfaction Survey, UK. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 111(1). 139–148. 1 indexed citations

2.

Campochiaro, Peter A., David M. Brown, Andrew Pearson, et al.. (2012). Sustained Delivery Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Inserts Provide Benefit for at Least 3 Years in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 119(10). 2125–2132. 376 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Campochiaro, Peter A., David M. Brown, Andrew Pearson, et al.. (2011). Long-term Benefit of Sustained-Delivery Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Inserts for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 118(4). 626–635.e2. 288 indexed citations

4.

Holekamp, Nancy M., M.A. Thomas, & Andrew Pearson. (2005). The safety profile of long-term, high-dose intraocular corticosteroid delivery. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 139(3). 421–428. 36 indexed citations

5.

Pearson, Andrew, et al.. (1990). The Relationship of Mean Defect to Corrected Loss Variance in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ophthalmologica. 200(1). 16–21. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact