Andrew P. Barbour
- Surgery top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- B. Mark SmithersBryan BurmeisterVal GebskiJohn ZalcbergKatrin Marie SjoquistR. J. SimesJanine ThomasD. C. Gotley
- Topics
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (40 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (31 papers)Esophageal and GI Pathology (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew P. Barbour
92 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Surgery 2.7k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.2k
- Oncology 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 726
- Cancer Research 515
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew P. Barbour
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew P. Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew P. Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew P. Barbour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew P. Barbour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew P. Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew P. Barbour. The network helps show where Andrew P. Barbour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew P. Barbour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew P. Barbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew P. Barbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew P. Barbour. Andrew P. Barbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | Pancreatic cancer: Is the surgeon still relevant? | 0 |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | Management of loco-regionally recurrent melanoma | 0 |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Expression of the CD44v2-10 isoform confers a metastatic phenotype: importance of the heparan sulfate attachment site CD44v3. | 55 |
About Andrew P. Barbour
Andrew P. Barbour is a scholar working on Oncology, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 95 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (40 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (31 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.2k citations), Surgery (2.7k citations) and Oncology (1.3k citations). Andrew P. Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. Mark Smithers, Bryan Burmeister, Val Gebski, John Zalcberg, Katrin Marie Sjoquist, R. J. Simes, Janine Thomas, D. C. Gotley, Euan Walpole and Jesper B. Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.