Andrew N. Priest
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Martin J. GravesDavid J. LomasEvis SalaMary A. McLeanTristan BarrettVincent J. GnanapragasamIlse JoubertJames D. Brenton
- Topics
- MRI in cancer diagnosis (42 papers)Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (39 papers)Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Andrew N. Priest
94 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.2k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 573
- Reproductive Medicine 210
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 207
- Epidemiology 196
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew N. Priest
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew N. Priest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew N. Priest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew N. Priest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew N. Priest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew N. Priest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew N. Priest. The network helps show where Andrew N. Priest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew N. Priest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew N. Priest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew N. Priest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew N. Priest. Andrew N. Priest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Andrew N. Priest
Andrew N. Priest is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Health Informatics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MRI in cancer diagnosis (42 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (39 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (207 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (210 citations). Andrew N. Priest has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Graves, David J. Lomas, Evis Sala, Mary A. McLean, Tristan Barrett, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Ilse Joubert, James D. Brenton, Robin Crawford and Andrew J. Patterson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.