Andrew Moss

1.1k total citations
35 papers, 732 citations indexed

About

Andrew Moss is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Genetics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Moss has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 732 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Genetics and 11 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Andrew Moss's work include Animal and Plant Science Education (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers). Andrew Moss is often cited by papers focused on Animal and Plant Science Education (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers). Andrew Moss collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia. Andrew Moss's co-authors include Maggie Esson, Eric Jensen, Markus Gusset, David Francis, Alexander Charles Lees, Stuart J. Marsden, Nigel Collar, Susan L. Walker, Charlotte Smith and Thomas L. Webb and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Conservation Biology and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Moss

34 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew Moss United Kingdom	14	479	220	208	186	149	35	732
Carol D. Saunders United States	16	643 1.3×	315 1.4×	188 0.9×	388 2.1×	89 0.6×	21	1.0k
Alia M. Dietsch United States	14	235 0.5×	138 0.6×	104 0.5×	161 0.9×	395 2.7×	33	795
Jenny Anne Glikman United States	19	311 0.6×	238 1.1×	114 0.5×	162 0.9×	731 4.9×	58	1.1k
Jens Frank Sweden	14	173 0.4×	242 1.1×	135 0.6×	154 0.8×	674 4.5×	34	876
Harry C. Zinn United States	17	500 1.0×	140 0.6×	81 0.4×	151 0.8×	446 3.0×	31	1.0k
Silvio Marchini Brazil	18	249 0.5×	188 0.9×	87 0.4×	174 0.9×	716 4.8×	42	1.0k
Jeffrey C. Skibins United States	11	287 0.6×	133 0.6×	67 0.3×	184 1.0×	122 0.8×	27	578
Lily M. van Eeden Australia	16	160 0.3×	265 1.2×	144 0.7×	191 1.0×	755 5.1×	43	1.0k
Dawn Burnham United Kingdom	18	305 0.6×	197 0.9×	77 0.4×	128 0.7×	666 4.5×	34	1.0k
Hannah S. Mumby United Kingdom	13	157 0.3×	178 0.8×	184 0.9×	68 0.4×	392 2.6×	31	806

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Moss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Moss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Moss. The network helps show where Andrew Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Moss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Moss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Moss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Moss. Andrew Moss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ascensão, Fernando, et al.. (2025). Wildlife crossing signs have limited effectiveness in reducing vehicle speeds. Journal of Environmental Management. 396. 128107–128107.

Collar, Nigel, et al.. (2024). Messaging with appeal to intrinsic or relational values shows potential to shift demand for wildlife as pets. People and Nature. 7(1). 4–14. 1 indexed citations

Webb, Thomas L., et al.. (2024). A meta‐analysis of the effect of visiting zoos and aquariums on visitors’ conservation knowledge, beliefs, and behavior. Conservation Biology. 39(1). e14237–e14237. 8 indexed citations

Moss, Andrew, et al.. (2023). The Role of Zoos and Aquariums in Contributing to the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 445–461. 6 indexed citations

Rowland, Hannah M., R. Blundell, Julian Chantrey, et al.. (2023). AMYLOIDOSIS IN CAPTIVE EUROPEAN EASTERN BONGO (TRAGELAPHUS EURYCERUS ISAACI): PREVALENCE, PREDICTIVE FACTORS, ORGAN PREDILECTION, AND SERUM AMYLOID A CONCENTRATIONS. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 53(4). 696–704. 1 indexed citations

Moss, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Assessing the effect of interpretation design traits on zoo visitor engagement. Zoo Biology. 42(4). 567–576. 4 indexed citations

Walker, Susan L., et al.. (2023). The value of zoos for species and society: The need for a new model. Biological Conservation. 279. 109925–109925. 18 indexed citations

Unwin, Steve, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the contribution of a wildlife health capacity building program on orangutan conservation. American Journal of Primatology. 84(4-5). e23273–e23273. 3 indexed citations

Collar, Nigel, et al.. (2021). Understanding motivations and attitudes among songbird‐keepers to identify best approaches to demand reduction. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(10). 7 indexed citations

10.

Collar, Nigel, et al.. (2020). Characterizing bird‐keeping user‐groups on Java reveals distinct behaviours, profiles and potential for change. People and Nature. 2(4). 877–888. 16 indexed citations

11.

Bainbridge, Alan, Andrew Moss, Anne‐Caroline Prévot, et al.. (2019). Large carnivores and zoos as catalysts for engaging the public in the protection of biodiversity. Nature Conservation. 37. 133–150. 13 indexed citations

12.

Moss, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Measuring the impact of an in-school zoo education programme. 5(1). 33–37. 4 indexed citations

13.

Jensen, Eric, Andrew Moss, & Markus Gusset. (2017). Quantifying long‐term impact of zoo and aquarium visits on biodiversity‐related learning outcomes. Zoo Biology. 36(4). 294–297. 43 indexed citations

14.

Moss, Andrew. (2016). Can conservation education learn anything from ‘Big Data’?. International Zoo Yearbook. 50(1). 23–33. 1 indexed citations

15.

Esson, Maggie & Andrew Moss. (2016). The challenges of evaluating conservation education across cultures. International Zoo Yearbook. 50(1). 61–67. 11 indexed citations

16.

Esson, Maggie & Andrew Moss. (2014). Zoos as a context for reinforcing environmentally responsible behaviour: The dual challenges that zoo educators have set themselves. 2(1). 8–13. 5 indexed citations

17.

Boomer, Ian, Ulrich von Grafenstein, & Andrew Moss. (2011). Lateglacial to early Holocene multiproxy record from Loch Assynt, NW Scotland. Proceedings of the Geologists Association. 123(1). 109–116. 5 indexed citations

18.

Moss, Andrew & Maggie Esson. (2010). Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biology. 29(6). 715–731. 113 indexed citations

19.

Rissik, David, et al.. (2004). Assessing Condition and Management Priorities for Estuaries in Australia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 551–557. 1 indexed citations

20.

Moss, Andrew. (1975). Writing as Problem Solving. Education and Urban Society. 7(2). 187–192. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact