Andrew M. Peterson

1.8k citations
55 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 14

Andrew M. Peterson

50 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Andrew M. Peterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Family Practice 487
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 265
  • Sensory Systems 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 177
  • Transplantation 26
Replace Jonathan H. Watanabe with:
Jonathan H. Watanabe United States
Rebecca S. Finley United States
P.H.M. van der Kuy Netherlands
Feride Frech United States
Thomas Bramley United States
Xiaojuan Mi United States
Amit D. Raval United States
Kristy Iglay United States
Adeline Gallini France
Diana Isaacs United States
Andrew M. Peterson relative to Jonathan H. Watanabe United States Jonathan H. Watanabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Jonathan H. Watanabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Peterson. The network helps show where Andrew M. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew M. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew M. Peterson Line = papers co-authored together Andrew M. Peterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20252
5 20241
6 20240
7 20245
8 20238
9 20239
10 20224
11 20223
12 202112
13 20193
14 20174
15 20161
16 2013143
17 20078
18 200529
19 20031
20 200321

About Andrew M. Peterson

Andrew M. Peterson is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Sensory Systems, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (15 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (6 papers), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (487 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (265 citations) and Sensory Systems (60 citations). Andrew M. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Liza Takiya, Rebecca S. Finley, Sarah A. Spinler, Simon de Denus, Alesia Sadosky, John E. Zeber, Elizabeth Manias, David Hutchins, Allison Williams and Dorina Kallogjeri. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Value in Health, Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026