Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm
19674.1k citationsAndrew J. ViterbiIEEE Transactions on Information Theoryprofile →
On the capacity of a cellular CDMA system
19912.1k citationsI. M. Jacobs, R. Padovani et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Viterbi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Viterbi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Viterbi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Viterbi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Viterbi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Viterbi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Viterbi. The network helps show where Andrew J. Viterbi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Viterbi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Viterbi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Viterbi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Viterbi. Andrew J. Viterbi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kalman, R. E., G. I. Marchuk, Antonio Ruberti, & Andrew J. Viterbi. (1987). Recent advances in communication and control theory. Medical Entomology and Zoology.14 indexed citations
8.
Viterbi, Andrew J. & A.M. Viterbi. (1983). Nonlinear estimation of PSK-modulated carrier phase with application to burst digital transmission. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 29(4). 543–551.740 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Bar-David, I., et al.. (1980). Interleaving and coding for satellite channels perturbed by pulsed RFI. International Conference on Communications. 1.1 indexed citations
Viterbi, Andrew J.. (1975). Asymptotic Performance of Three Hard-Limiting Noncoherent Correlator-Envelope Detectors. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 196–205.2 indexed citations
13.
Viterbi, Andrew J.. (1973). Information theory in the sixties. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 19(3). 257–262.8 indexed citations
14.
Viterbi, Andrew J., et al.. (1971). High Data Rate Coding for the Space Station Telemetry Links. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).1 indexed citations
15.
Heller, J. A., et al.. (1971). Coding systems study for high data rate telemetry links. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).20 indexed citations
Viterbi, Andrew J.. (1958). Acquisition and Tracking Behavior of Phase-Locked Loops. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.