Andrew J. Bishop
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- B. Ashleigh GuadagnoloPamela K. AllenAndrew N. RedingtonChristina L. RolandPaul A. WhiteKeila E. TorresAmol J. GhiaLaurence D. Rhines
- Topics
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (46 papers)Management of metastatic bone disease (32 papers)Cardiac tumors and thrombi (23 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew J. Bishop
114 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.1k
- Surgery 850
- Oncology 623
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 393
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 338
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Bishop. The network helps show where Andrew J. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Bishop. Andrew J. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 88 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Andrew J. Bishop
Andrew J. Bishop is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Rheumatology, having authored 124 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (46 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (32 papers) and Cardiac tumors and thrombi (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.1k citations), Genetics (247 citations) and Oncology (623 citations). Andrew J. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Pamela K. Allen, Andrew N. Redington, Christina L. Roland, Paul A. White, Keila E. Torres, Amol J. Ghia, Laurence D. Rhines, Claudio E. Tatsui and Barry W. Feig. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.