This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Howes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Howes. The network helps show where Andrew Howes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Howes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Howes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Howes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Howes. Andrew Howes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Myers, Christopher W., Richard L. Lewis, & Andrew Howes. (2013). Bounded Optimal State Estimation and Control in Visual Search: Explaining Distractor Ratio Effects. Cognitive Science. 35(35).5 indexed citations
6.
Howes, Andrew, David Peebles, & Richard Cooper. (2009). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling – ICCM2009. Manchester, UK..2 indexed citations
Howes, Andrew, et al.. (2008). A Bayesian model of how people search online consumer reviews. Cognitive Science. 30(30). 553–558.3 indexed citations
9.
Patrick, John, et al.. (2006). Planning with Information Access Costs in Mind. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).3 indexed citations
10.
Howes, Andrew, et al.. (2005). Architectural Building Blocks as the Locus of Adaptive Behavior Selection. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27).1 indexed citations
11.
Howes, Andrew, et al.. (2005). Information-Requirements Grammar: A Theory of the Structure of Competence for Interaction. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27).13 indexed citations
12.
Howes, Andrew, et al.. (2004). Cognitive Constraint Modeling: A Formal Approach to Supporting Reasoning About Behavior. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).22 indexed citations
13.
Brumby, Duncan P. & Andrew Howes. (2004). Good enough but I'll just check: Web-page search as attentional refocusing. UCL Discovery (University College London). 46–51.26 indexed citations
14.
Lewis, Richard L., Alonso Vera, & Andrew Howes. (2004). A constraint-based approach to understanding the composition of skill. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 148–153.12 indexed citations
15.
Brumby, Duncan P. & Andrew Howes. (2003). Interdependence and Past Experience in Menu Choice Assessment. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).7 indexed citations
16.
Howes, Andrew, et al.. (2001). The Effect of Practice on Strategy Change. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).2 indexed citations
Miles, Gareth E. & Andrew Howes. (1999). Using 3D For Electronic Commerce On The Web: A Psychological Perspective. World Conference on WWW and Internet. 1999(1). 745–750.1 indexed citations
19.
Howes, Andrew & R. Michael Young. (1993). Predicting the learnability of task-action mappings. MIT Press eBooks. 1204–1209.2 indexed citations
20.
Howes, Andrew & Stephen J. Payne. (1990). Supporting exploratory learning. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 881–885.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.