Andrew Hindmarsh

2.2k total citations
22 papers, 703 citations indexed

About

Andrew Hindmarsh is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Gastroenterology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Hindmarsh has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 703 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Surgery, 11 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 6 papers in Gastroenterology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Hindmarsh's work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (10 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (5 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). Andrew Hindmarsh is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal and GI Pathology (10 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (5 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). Andrew Hindmarsh collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and United States. Andrew Hindmarsh's co-authors include M Rhodes, Michael Lewis, Brendan Koo, E Cheong, David Mahon, Janak Saada, S. Mehta, Richard Tighe, Michael Rhodes and R. H. Lowndes and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Hindmarsh

20 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Hindmarsh United Kingdom 12 600 362 192 102 75 22 703
I C Wesdorp Netherlands 11 545 0.9× 289 0.8× 267 1.4× 56 0.5× 65 0.9× 16 628
Jay J. Mamel United States 10 267 0.4× 168 0.5× 80 0.4× 35 0.3× 63 0.8× 31 396
Steve Schutz United States 8 429 0.7× 362 1.0× 84 0.4× 20 0.2× 276 3.7× 11 608
Latif Abbasoğlu Türkiye 11 288 0.5× 121 0.3× 18 0.1× 123 1.2× 37 0.5× 29 394
Mark K. Ferguson United States 10 348 0.6× 327 0.9× 115 0.6× 30 0.3× 84 1.1× 11 565
Louis De Cannière Belgium 11 362 0.6× 151 0.4× 47 0.2× 18 0.2× 74 1.0× 27 461
Vincenzo Cangemi Italy 9 302 0.5× 304 0.8× 28 0.1× 105 1.0× 179 2.4× 35 474
Attila Paszt Hungary 13 295 0.5× 148 0.4× 48 0.3× 27 0.3× 52 0.7× 61 382
Olivier Emungania France 10 502 0.8× 168 0.5× 45 0.2× 32 0.3× 107 1.4× 17 627
Xiaorong Gong China 10 182 0.3× 47 0.1× 140 0.7× 93 0.9× 49 0.7× 19 394

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Hindmarsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Hindmarsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Hindmarsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Hindmarsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Hindmarsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Hindmarsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Hindmarsh. The network helps show where Andrew Hindmarsh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Hindmarsh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Hindmarsh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Hindmarsh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Hindmarsh. Andrew Hindmarsh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bennett, John M., Peter Safranek, Vijay Sujendran, et al.. (2024). Impact of early enteral feed composition on the rate of chyle leak post-esophagectomy. Diseases of the Esophagus. 37(6). 2 indexed citations
2.
Pournaras, Dimitri J., Richard Hardwick, Peter Safranek, et al.. (2018). Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (E‐Vac): A Treatment Option in Oesophagogastric Surgery. World Journal of Surgery. 42(8). 2507–2511. 71 indexed citations
3.
Laliotis, Aggelos, et al.. (2018). Mediastinal herniation of the biliary tract leading to bile duct obstruction following oesophagectomy. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 100(8). e211–e213.
4.
Patel, Anant, et al.. (2016). Iatrogenic oesophageal perforation during placement of an endoscopic vacuum therapy device. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2016(7). rjw131–rjw131. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, Joseph R. Smith, & Peter Safranek. (2012). Pulsion Diverticulae of the Esophagus. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 347(1). 78–78.
7.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, Nigel J. Belshaw, Samir Mehta, Ian T. Johnson, & M Rhodes. (2011). Can the rat be used as a valid model of human esophageal adenocarcinoma?. Diseases of the Esophagus. 25(2). 159–165. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bignell, Mark, et al.. (2011). ERCP and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES): A Safe and Definitive Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis with the Gallbladder Left In Situ. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 15(12). 2205–2210. 18 indexed citations
9.
Bignell, Mark, Andrew Hindmarsh, Bhavani Sidhartha Mothe, et al.. (2011). Assessment of cosmetic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among women 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there a problem?. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(8). 2574–2577. 30 indexed citations
10.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, Mark Bignell, & M Rhodes. (2011). Laparoscopic stenting of the common bile duct. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 93(3). 256–257. 1 indexed citations
11.
A, Alm, et al.. (2009). Security Swipe Cards and Scanners are a Potential Reservoir for Hospital-Acquired Infection. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 91(2). 155–158. 4 indexed citations
12.
Burgess, Neil, Brendan Koo, Robert C. Calvert, et al.. (2007). Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic v Open Nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology. 21(6). 610–613. 63 indexed citations
13.
Mehta, Samir, Andrew Hindmarsh, & M Rhodes. (2005). Changes in functional gastrointestinal symptoms as a result of antireflux surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 19(11). 1447–1450. 6 indexed citations
14.
Mehta, S., Andrew Hindmarsh, E Cheong, et al.. (2005). Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outflow obstruction. Surgical Endoscopy. 20(2). 239–242. 157 indexed citations
15.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, Brendan Koo, Michael Lewis, & M Rhodes. (2005). Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surgical Endoscopy. 19(8). 1109–1112. 38 indexed citations
16.
Mahon, David, M Rhodes, Bart Decadt, et al.. (2005). Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. British journal of surgery. 92(6). 695–699. 133 indexed citations
17.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, Michael Lewis, & M Rhodes. (2004). Stapled laparoscopic cystgastrostomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 19(1). 143–147. 16 indexed citations
18.
Hindmarsh, Andrew, E Cheong, Michael Lewis, & M Rhodes. (2003). Attendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. British journal of surgery. 90(9). 1152–1154. 70 indexed citations
19.
Hindmarsh, Andrew. (2002). An unusual presentation of a lumbar hernia. Emergency Medicine Journal. 19(5). 460–460. 4 indexed citations
20.
Griffin, Julian L., et al.. (2002). Vitamin E deficiency and metabolic deficits in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis described by bioinformatics. Physiological Genomics. 11(3). 195–203. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026