Andrew Galbraith

61 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Andrew Galbraith
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Transplantation 244
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 839
  • Surgery 822
  • Epidemiology 631
  • Oncology 390
Replace Peter Fraunberger with:
Peter Fraunberger Austria
Stanley J. Radio United States
James Lordan United Kingdom
José Tallaj United States
Josef Kovařík Austria
James Yun United States
B. A. Johnson United States
Gundeep Dhillon United States
Vibha N. Lama United States
Markus Rothenburger Germany
Andrew Galbraith relative to Peter Fraunberger Austria Peter Fraunberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Peter Fraunberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Galbraith. The network helps show where Andrew Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Galbraith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Galbraith Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Galbraith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20242
4 20221
5
FAMILIARISATION AND RELIABILITY OF SPRINT TEST INDICES DURING LABORATORY AND FIELD ASSESSMENT
200914
6
A Complete Mock Circulation Loop for the Evaluation of Left, Right and Biventricular Assist Devices
20053
7 200530
8 20053
9 200315
10 200374
11 20030
12 199997
13 1997155
14 19951
15 199565
16 199474
17 199321
18 199283
19 199173
20 19893

About Andrew Galbraith

Andrew Galbraith is a scholar working on Aging, Transplantation, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (7 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (244 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (839 citations), Surgery (822 citations), Epidemiology (631 citations) and Oncology (390 citations). Andrew Galbraith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David C. McGiffin, Michael F. Good, Sumalee Pruksakorn, Gerry O’Driscoll, David W.M. Muller, Steven Faddy, Phillip Spratt, Peter Ruygrok, Mark Richardson and D.S. Esmore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The Lancet, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026