Andrew G. Mott

571 total citations
23 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Andrew G. Mott is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew G. Mott has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 7 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Andrew G. Mott's work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (16 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (7 papers) and Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (6 papers). Andrew G. Mott is often cited by papers focused on Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (16 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (7 papers) and Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (6 papers). Andrew G. Mott collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Andrew G. Mott's co-authors include Mary J. Miller, Gary L. Wood, Robert C. Hoffman, Shizhuo Yin, Timothy M. Pritchett, Chao Wang, Wenfang Sun, Joy E. Haley, Bingguang Zhang and David M. Mackie and has published in prestigious journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

In The Last Decade

Andrew G. Mott

22 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Andrew G. Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Biomedical Engineering 309
  • Materials Chemistry 303
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 197
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 149
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 134
Replace T. J. McKay with:
T. J. McKay Australia
N. Srinivas India
Donna M. Brandelik United States
M. V. Jouravlev South Korea
Tzer‐Hsiang Huang Taiwan
T. H. Wei United States
F. Hassen Tunisia
T. Xia United States
Keith Kang United States
T. J. McKay Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Andrew G. Mott
Andrew G. Mott · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Andrew G. Mott
Andrew G. Mott · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew G. Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew G. Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew G. Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew G. Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew G. Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew G. Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew G. Mott. The network helps show where Andrew G. Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew G. Mott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew G. Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew G. Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew G. Mott. Andrew G. Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 13
3 15
4 7
5 11
6 0
7 53
8 89
9 3
10 3
11 25
12 15
13 32
14 5
15 1
16 13
17 1
18 112
19 7
20 17

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026