Andrew Forgie

832 total citations
25 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Andrew Forgie is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, General Dentistry and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Forgie has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Oral Surgery, 8 papers in General Dentistry and 8 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Forgie's work include Dental Radiography and Imaging (11 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (8 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (8 papers). Andrew Forgie is often cited by papers focused on Dental Radiography and Imaging (11 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (8 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (8 papers). Andrew Forgie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Brazil. Andrew Forgie's co-authors include C M Pine, Nigel Pitts, Peter Mossey, D. R. Stirrups, C. J. Larmour, Bikram Thind, Brendan Scott, David M. Davis, B J J Scott and D. M. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Forgie

24 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Andrew Forgie
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Oral Surgery 304
  • Molecular Biology 213
  • Periodontics 149
  • Genetics 133
  • General Dentistry 108
Replace Lorne D. Koroluk with:
Lorne D. Koroluk United States
Domagoj Glavina Croatia
Sevi Burçak Çehreli Türkiye
Hassan Ziada Ireland
Papa Ngom Senegal
KS Uloopi India
J. Heidmann Denmark
Shalini Kanagasingam United Kingdom
Vicky Ehlers Germany
Rívea Inês Ferreira Brazil
Lorne D. Koroluk United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Andrew Forgie
Andrew Forgie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Andrew Forgie
Andrew Forgie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Forgie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Forgie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Forgie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Forgie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Forgie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Forgie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Forgie. The network helps show where Andrew Forgie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Forgie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Forgie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Forgie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Forgie. Andrew Forgie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 5
4 8
5 3
6 7
7
A pilot study to analyze the uniqueness of anterior teeth using a novel three-dimensional approach
6
8 11
9 13
10 29
11 1
12 13
13 42
14
Management of hypodontia: orthodontic considerations (II).
14
15 33
16
The use of magnification in a preventive approach to caries detection.
32
17 29
18 10
19 46
20 28

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026