Andrew Fenwick

593 total citations
42 papers, 313 citations indexed

About

Andrew Fenwick is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Fenwick has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 313 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 31 papers in Radiation and 11 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Fenwick's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (18 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (14 papers). Andrew Fenwick is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (18 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (14 papers). Andrew Fenwick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Andrew Fenwick's co-authors include J D Keightley, S.M. Collins, Andy Pearce, Lena Johansson, P. H. Regan, Marco D’Arienzo, Douglas W. Stephan, Lidia Strigari, A. Robinson and P. Ivanov and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Fenwick

39 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Fenwick United Kingdom 11 201 190 77 47 45 42 313
Lena Johansson United Kingdom 13 319 1.6× 161 0.8× 199 2.6× 34 0.7× 101 2.2× 53 480
C Kessler France 9 215 1.1× 138 0.7× 64 0.8× 94 2.0× 20 0.4× 72 279
Takuya Saze Japan 10 161 0.8× 131 0.7× 36 0.5× 60 1.3× 9 0.2× 39 301
Dmitry Filosofov Russia 8 78 0.4× 139 0.7× 21 0.3× 54 1.1× 3 0.1× 18 282
F. Juget Switzerland 7 100 0.5× 77 0.4× 30 0.4× 35 0.7× 21 0.5× 28 245
W.M. van Wyngaardt South Africa 7 129 0.6× 46 0.2× 89 1.2× 23 0.5× 53 1.2× 26 157
Jeffrey T. Cessna United States 17 510 2.5× 358 1.9× 273 3.5× 103 2.2× 186 4.1× 62 696
Elena Kurakina Russia 7 65 0.3× 120 0.6× 14 0.2× 47 1.0× 3 0.1× 15 250
Daniel W. Mundy United States 10 228 1.1× 89 0.5× 40 0.5× 172 3.7× 29 0.6× 31 304
Benoît Sabot France 11 197 1.0× 57 0.3× 164 2.1× 6 0.1× 59 1.3× 41 349

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Fenwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Fenwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Fenwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Fenwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Fenwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Fenwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Fenwick. The network helps show where Andrew Fenwick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Fenwick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Fenwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Fenwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Fenwick. Andrew Fenwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hussein, Mohammad, et al.. (2025). The role of SiPM-based PET for accurate volume delineation. 68–68.
2.
Gregory, Rebecca, Oliver Berry, Vineet Prakash, et al.. (2024). Enhanced performance characteristics of digital PET for small feature detection relative to non-digital PET. 162–162. 1 indexed citations
3.
Denis-Bacelar, Ana M., Andrew Fenwick, Brian F. Hutton, et al.. (2023). Triple modality image reconstruction of PET data using SPECT, PET, CT information increases lesion uptake in images of patients treated with radioembolization with $$^{90}Y$$ micro-spheres. EJNMMI Physics. 10(1). 30–30. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cullen, D. M., Ana M. Denis-Bacelar, Andrew Fenwick, et al.. (2023). Quantitative validation of Monte Carlo SPECT simulation: application to a Mediso AnyScan GATE simulation. EJNMMI Physics. 10(1). 60–60. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bergeron, Denis E., Karsten Kossert, S.M. Collins, & Andrew Fenwick. (2022). Realization and dissemination of activity standards for medically important alpha-emitting radionuclides. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 184. 110161–110161. 7 indexed citations
6.
Denis-Bacelar, Ana M., Andrew Fenwick, Brian F. Hutton, et al.. (2022). Hybrid kernelised expectation maximisation for Bremsstrahlung SPECT reconstruction in SIRT with 90Y micro-spheres. EJNMMI Physics. 9(1). 25–25. 3 indexed citations
7.
Fenwick, Andrew, et al.. (2020). IPEM topical report: current molecular radiotherapy service provision and guidance on the implications of setting up a dosimetry service. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65(24). 245038–245038. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bobin, Christophe, V. Chisté, S.M. Collins, et al.. (2019). Activity measurements and determination of nuclear decay data of 166Ho in the MRTDosimetry project. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 153. 108826–108826. 14 indexed citations
9.
Galea, R., et al.. (2019). The first official measurement of 11C in the SIRTI. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 154. 108834–108834. 1 indexed citations
11.
Collins, S.M., et al.. (2018). The potential radio-immunotherapeutic α-emitter 227Th – part II: Absolute γ-ray emission intensities from the excited levels of 223Ra. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 145. 251–257. 11 indexed citations
12.
Fenwick, Andrew, James Scuffham, Lena Johansson, et al.. (2018). Inter-comparison of quantitative imaging of lutetium-177 (177Lu) in European hospitals. EJNMMI Physics. 5(1). 17–17. 21 indexed citations
13.
Fenwick, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Quantitative imaging, dosimetry and metrology; Where do National Metrology Institutes fit in?. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 134. 74–78. 8 indexed citations
14.
Mezzenga, Emilio, Marco D’Arienzo, Lidia Strigari, et al.. (2017). Quantitative accuracy of 177Lu SPECT imaging for molecular radiotherapy. PLoS ONE. 12(8). e0182888–e0182888. 21 indexed citations
15.
D’Arienzo, Marco, M G Cox, M. D’Andrea, et al.. (2016). Gamma camera calibration and validation for quantitative SPECT imaging with 177Lu. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 112. 156–164. 35 indexed citations
16.
17.
Collins, S.M., et al.. (2015). Direct measurement of the half-life of 223Ra. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 99. 46–53. 35 indexed citations
18.
Fenwick, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Measurement of the 109 Cd half-life. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 109. 151–153. 3 indexed citations
19.
Michotte, C, I. A. Kharitonov, J D Keightley, et al.. (2015). Comparison of 18 F activity measurements at the VNIIM, NPL and the ENEA-INMRI using the SIRTI of the BIPM. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 109. 17–23. 5 indexed citations
20.
Fenwick, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Migration to new ampoule types for the NPL secondary standard ionisation chambers. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 87. 224–228. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026