Andrew E. Berke
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Environmental Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Jonathan D. RaffNicole K. ScharkoF. Fleming CrimR. K. WehnerChris HemmerichUrsel M. E. SchütteJeffrey R. WhiteR. Brunkhorst
- Topics
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (5 papers)Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers)Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical PhysicsEnvironmental Science & TechnologyThe American Journal of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Andrew E. Berke
12 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Atmospheric Science 186
- Global and Planetary Change 77
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 60
- Environmental Engineering 43
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 41
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Berke
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Berke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Berke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Berke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Berke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Berke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Berke. The network helps show where Andrew E. Berke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew E. Berke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew E. Berke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew E. Berke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew E. Berke. Andrew E. Berke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 121 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 28 |
About Andrew E. Berke
Andrew E. Berke is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (186 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (60 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (77 citations). Andrew E. Berke has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan D. Raff, Nicole K. Scharko, F. Fleming Crim, R. K. Wehner, Chris Hemmerich, Ursel M. E. Schütte, Jeffrey R. White, R. Brunkhorst, C. Oberhoff and R. Becher. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Environmental Science & Technology and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.