Andrew D. Wiles
- Surgery top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- David G. ThompsonTerry M. PetersJohn MooreChris WedlakeCristian A. LinteDaniel BainbridgeT.M. PetersDanielle F. Pace
- Topics
- Surgical Simulation and Training (17 papers)Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingPhysics in Medicine and BiologyLecture notes in computer science
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew D. Wiles
27 papers receiving 651 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Surgery 319
- Biomedical Engineering 318
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 253
- Aerospace Engineering 164
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew D. Wiles
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew D. Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew D. Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew D. Wiles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew D. Wiles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew D. Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew D. Wiles. The network helps show where Andrew D. Wiles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew D. Wiles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew D. Wiles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew D. Wiles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew D. Wiles. Andrew D. Wiles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 217 | |
| 20 | 137 |
About Andrew D. Wiles
Andrew D. Wiles is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 27 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (17 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (253 citations), Radiation (80 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (318 citations). Andrew D. Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include David G. Thompson, Terry M. Peters, John Moore, Chris Wedlake, Cristian A. Linte, Daniel Bainbridge, T.M. Peters, Danielle F. Pace, G Guiraudon and David Lindisch. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Lecture notes in computer science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.