Andrew D. Weiss
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- S. B. WeissAntoine GuisanErica FleishmanGeorge T. AustinClaire KremenDeborah M. GordonAdina M. MerenlenderJade d’Alpoim Guedes
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (3 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEcologyConservation Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Andrew D. Weiss
11 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Ecology 553
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 484
- Global and Planetary Change 472
- Ecological Modeling 410
- Environmental Engineering 279
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew D. Weiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew D. Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew D. Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew D. Weiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew D. Weiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew D. Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew D. Weiss. The network helps show where Andrew D. Weiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew D. Weiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew D. Weiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew D. Weiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew D. Weiss. Andrew D. Weiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | Topographic position and landforms analysis | 453 |
| 5 | 106 | |
| 6 | GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distributionbreakdown → | 690 |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 84 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 139 | |
| 11 | 20 |
About Andrew D. Weiss
Andrew D. Weiss is a scholar working on Archeology, Ecological Modeling and Paleontology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (410 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (484 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (472 citations). Andrew D. Weiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include S. B. Weiss, Antoine Guisan, Erica Fleishman, George T. Austin, Claire Kremen, Deborah M. Gordon, Adina M. Merenlender, Jade d’Alpoim Guedes, Stephan Weber and Vincent C. Pigott. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecology and Conservation Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.