Andrew D. Prather
- Oncology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Donald M. DavisValentine NfonsamJorge MarcetJared C. FrattiniJanice S. SungRobert C. WardChristopher ComstockIlana F. Gareen
- Topics
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers)Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers)Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
Andrew D. Prather
13 papers receiving 465 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Oncology 198
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 185
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 180
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 137
- Cancer Research 74
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew D. Prather
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew D. Prather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew D. Prather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew D. Prather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew D. Prather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew D. Prather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew D. Prather. The network helps show where Andrew D. Prather may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew D. Prather
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew D. Prather. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew D. Prather based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew D. Prather. Andrew D. Prather is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screeningbreakdown → | 265 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 107 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2 |
About Andrew D. Prather
Andrew D. Prather is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 13 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (180 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (137 citations) and Oncology (198 citations). Andrew D. Prather has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Donald M. Davis, Valentine Nfonsam, Jorge Marcet, Jared C. Frattini, Janice S. Sung, Robert C. Ward, Christopher Comstock, Ilana F. Gareen, Jennifer A. Harvey and Gillian M. Newstead. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.