Andrew D. Napper
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter S. DiStefanoRory CurtisThomas McDonaghScott L. DiamondJeffrey HixonStanley FieldsMatt KaeberleinBrian K. Kennedy
- Topics
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers)Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers)Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (4 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Andrew D. Napper
50 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 730
- Epidemiology 369
- Physiology 364
- Oncology 324
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew D. Napper
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew D. Napper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew D. Napper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew D. Napper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew D. Napper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew D. Napper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew D. Napper. The network helps show where Andrew D. Napper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew D. Napper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew D. Napper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew D. Napper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew D. Napper. Andrew D. Napper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 89 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | Drug Discovery and Development of Innovative Therapeutics--IBC's 13th Annual World Congress. Approaches to cancer therapy. | 4 |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | Substrate-specific Activation of Sirtuins by Resveratrolbreakdown → | 603 |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Andrew D. Napper
Andrew D. Napper is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Aging, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (730 citations), Aging (107 citations) and Physiology (185 citations). Andrew D. Napper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Peter S. DiStefano, Rory Curtis, Thomas McDonagh, Scott L. Diamond, Jeffrey Hixon, Stanley Fields, Matt Kaeberlein, Brian K. Kennedy, Antonio Bedalov and Birgit Heltweg. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.