Andrew Cutting

424 total citations
8 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Andrew Cutting is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Cutting has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Andrew Cutting's work include Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (6 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). Andrew Cutting is often cited by papers focused on Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (6 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). Andrew Cutting collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Austria and United States. Andrew Cutting's co-authors include Craig A. Smith, Andrew Sinclair, Katie Ayers, Timothy J. Doran, Mark Tizard, Andrew T. Major, Tiong Yang Tan, Luke S. Lambeth, Stephanie Bannister and Kelly N. Roeszler and has published in prestigious journals such as Endocrinology, Developmental Biology and Biology of Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Cutting

7 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Cutting Australia 7 204 136 85 58 54 8 297
Maëva Elzaïat France 9 274 1.3× 217 1.6× 114 1.3× 91 1.6× 26 0.5× 14 379
Ee Ting Ng Australia 9 245 1.2× 293 2.2× 90 1.1× 66 1.1× 19 0.4× 13 403
Anthony D. Krentz United States 10 390 1.9× 397 2.9× 135 1.6× 84 1.4× 34 0.6× 14 677
Martín A. Estermann Australia 10 154 0.8× 114 0.8× 66 0.8× 44 0.8× 8 0.1× 22 231
Danièle Carré‐Eusèbe France 9 494 2.4× 414 3.0× 300 3.5× 177 3.1× 50 0.9× 11 683
Jennifer A Hernandez Gifford United States 9 118 0.6× 195 1.4× 86 1.0× 210 3.6× 12 0.2× 26 416
Jason Ioannidis United Kingdom 10 131 0.6× 219 1.6× 39 0.5× 47 0.8× 11 0.2× 16 416
Irene Mondéjar Spain 9 84 0.4× 107 0.8× 270 3.2× 297 5.1× 16 0.3× 11 400
Kunming Li China 12 60 0.3× 110 0.8× 118 1.4× 115 2.0× 12 0.2× 41 428
Pilar Buendía Spain 10 113 0.6× 57 0.4× 124 1.5× 195 3.4× 16 0.3× 13 376

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Cutting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Cutting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Cutting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Cutting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Cutting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Cutting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Cutting. The network helps show where Andrew Cutting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Cutting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Cutting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Cutting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Cutting. Andrew Cutting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Cutting, Andrew, Tiong Yang Tan, Andrew Sinclair, et al.. (2018). The cell biology and molecular genetics of Müllerian duct development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology. 7(3). e310–e310. 61 indexed citations
2.
Lambeth, Luke S., Kirsten R. Morris, Katie Ayers, et al.. (2016). Overexpression of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Disrupts Gonadal Sex Differentiation, Blocks Sex Hormone Synthesis, and Supports Cell Autonomous Sex Development in the Chicken. Endocrinology. 157(3). 1258–1275. 28 indexed citations
3.
Lambeth, Luke S., Katie Ayers, Andrew Cutting, et al.. (2015). Anti-Müllerian Hormone Is Required for Chicken Embryonic Urogenital System Growth but Not Sexual Differentiation1. Biology of Reproduction. 93(6). 138–138. 25 indexed citations
4.
Ayers, Katie, Andrew Cutting, Kelly N. Roeszler, Andrew Sinclair, & Craig A. Smith. (2015). DMRT1 is required for Müllerian duct formation in the chicken embryo. Developmental Biology. 400(2). 224–236. 23 indexed citations
5.
Cutting, Andrew, Katie Ayers, N. Davidson, et al.. (2014). Identification, Expression, and Regulation of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Type-II Receptor in the Embryonic Chicken Gonad1. Biology of Reproduction. 90(5). 106–106. 28 indexed citations
6.
Cutting, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Just how conserved is vertebrate sex determination?. Developmental Dynamics. 242(4). 380–387. 93 indexed citations
7.
Cutting, Andrew, Stephanie Bannister, Timothy J. Doran, et al.. (2011). The potential role of microRNAs in regulating gonadal sex differentiation in the chicken embryo. Chromosome Research. 20(1). 201–213. 38 indexed citations
8.
Cutting, Andrew, et al.. (2001). JAZ volume 70 issue 3 Cover and Front matter. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. 70(3). f1–f2. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026