Andrew Crowe

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Andrew Crowe is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Crowe has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Andrew Crowe's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (8 papers) and Plant and animal studies (7 papers). Andrew Crowe is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (8 papers) and Plant and animal studies (7 papers). Andrew Crowe collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and France. Andrew Crowe's co-authors include David Garthwaite, David B. Roy, Richard F. Pywell, Ben A. Woodcock, Nick J. B. Isaac, James M. Bullock, Lisa Norton, Andrew C. Baker, Simon M. Smart and Bridget A. Emmett and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Crowe

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population chan... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300

Peers

Andrew Crowe
Chiara Polce United Kingdom
Charlotte L. Outhwaite United Kingdom
Lorna J. Cole United Kingdom
Souleymane Konaté Ivory Coast
Anne Oxbrough United Kingdom
Bumsuk Seo Germany
Chiara Polce United Kingdom
Andrew Crowe
Citations per year, relative to Andrew Crowe Andrew Crowe (= 1×) peers Chiara Polce

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Crowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Crowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Crowe. The network helps show where Andrew Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Crowe. Andrew Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C., N. D. Boatman, Giles E. Budge, et al.. (2024). Flowering plant communities mediate the effects of habitat composition and configuration on wild pollinator communities. Functional Ecology. 38(12). 2576–2594. 3 indexed citations
2.
Dlay, Satnam, et al.. (2023). Deep learning pose estimation for multi-cattle lameness detection. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 4499–4499. 27 indexed citations
3.
Baude, Mathilde, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, N. D. Boatman, et al.. (2022). Landscape-scale drivers of pollinator communities may depend on land-use configuration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 377(1853). 20210172–20210172. 10 indexed citations
4.
Crowe, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Can process-based modelling and economic valuation of ecosystem services inform land management policy at a catchment scale?. Land Use Policy. 96. 104636–104636. 9 indexed citations
5.
Baude, Mathilde, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, N. D. Boatman, et al.. (2017). A method for the objective selection of landscape‐scale study regions and sites at the national level. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 8(11). 1468–1476. 18 indexed citations
6.
Woodcock, Ben A., Nick J. B. Isaac, James M. Bullock, et al.. (2016). Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England. Nature Communications. 7(1). 12459–12459. 370 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Budge, Giles E., David Garthwaite, Andrew Crowe, et al.. (2015). Evidence for pollinator cost and farming benefits of neonicotinoid seed coatings on oilseed rape. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 12574–12574. 64 indexed citations
8.
Polce, Chiara, Michael P. D. Garratt, Mette Termansen, et al.. (2014). Climate‐driven spatial mismatches between British orchards and their pollinators: increased risks of pollination deficits. Global Change Biology. 20(9). 2815–2828. 61 indexed citations
9.
Polce, Chiara, Mette Termansen, Jesús Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, et al.. (2013). Species Distribution Models for Crop Pollination: A Modelling Framework Applied to Great Britain. PLoS ONE. 8(10). e76308–e76308. 56 indexed citations
10.
Maskell, Lindsay C., Andrew Crowe, Michael J. Dunbar, et al.. (2013). Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology. 50(3). 561–571. 93 indexed citations
11.
Norton, Lisa, Lindsay C. Maskell, Simon M. Smart, et al.. (2012). Measuring stock and change in the GB countryside for policy – Key findings and developments from the Countryside Survey 2007 field survey. Journal of Environmental Management. 113. 117–127. 51 indexed citations
12.
Sen, Antara, Ian J. Bateman, Paul Munday, et al.. (2012). Economic assessment of the recreational value of ecosystems in Great Britain. Econstor (Econstor). 1–63. 18 indexed citations
13.
Henrys, Peter A., Carly Stevens, Simon M. Smart, et al.. (2011). Impacts of nitrogen deposition on vascular plants in Britain: an analysis of two national observation networks. Biogeosciences. 8(12). 3501–3518. 26 indexed citations
14.
Stevens, Carly, Simon M. Smart, Peter A. Henrys, et al.. (2011). Interpretation of evidence of nitrogen impacts on vegetation in relation to UK biodiversity objectives. 7 indexed citations
15.
Smart, Simon M., W. A. Scott, Jeanette Whitaker, et al.. (2010). Empirical realised niche models for British higher and lower plants - development and preliminary testing. Journal of Vegetation Science. 31 indexed citations
16.
Smart, Simon M., Peter A. Henrys, W. A. Scott, et al.. (2010). Impacts of pollution and climate change on ombrotrophic Sphagnum species in the UK: analysis of uncertainties in two empirical niche models. Climate Research. 45. 163–177. 20 indexed citations
17.
Krause, Stefan, et al.. (2007). Groundwater-dependent wetlands in the UK and Ireland : controls, eco-hydrological functions and assessing the likelihood of damage from human activities.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 4 indexed citations
18.
Smart, Richard P., et al.. (2007). Bracken effects on inorganic nitrogen leaching from an upland podzol. Soil Use and Management. 23(3). 317–322. 6 indexed citations
19.
Huby, Meg, Steve Cinderby, Andrew Crowe, et al.. (2006). The Association of Natural, Social and Economic Factors with Bird Species Richness in Rural England. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 57(2). 295–312. 25 indexed citations
20.
Cresser, Malcolm S., Richard P. Smart, Matthew Clark, et al.. (2004). Controls on Leaching of N Species in Upland Moorland Catchments. Water Air and Soil Pollution Focus. 4(6). 85–95. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026