This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Coles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Coles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Coles more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Coles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Coles. The network helps show where Andrew Coles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Coles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Coles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Coles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Coles. Andrew Coles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coles, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Explaining Plan Quality Differences. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. 34. 324–332.
2.
Coles, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Planning and Acting While the Clock Ticks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. 34. 95–103.
Estremera, J., et al.. (2018). The ERGO Framework and its Use in Planetary/Orbital Scenarios. edoc (University of Basel).6 indexed citations
5.
Black, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Planning for Persuasion. Research Portal (King's College London). 933–942.4 indexed citations
6.
Black, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Antonomous Agents and Multiagent Sytems.1 indexed citations
7.
Coles, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling.6 indexed citations
8.
Coles, Andrew. (2014). Proceedings International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS. International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling.5 indexed citations
9.
Coles, Andrew. (2013). Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2013).3 indexed citations
10.
Coles, Andrew, et al.. (2012). A survey of the seventh international planning competition (review). AI Magazine.1 indexed citations
Coles, Andrew, Maria Fox, & Amanda Smith. (2007). A new local-search algorithm for forward-chaining planning. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 89–96.16 indexed citations
18.
Coles, Andrew, Maria Fox, & Amanda Smith. (2007). Online identification of useful macro-actions for planning. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 97–104.13 indexed citations
19.
Coles, Andrew, Maria Fox, Derek Long, & Amanda Smith. (2007). Planning with respect to an existing schedule of events. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 81–88.1 indexed citations
20.
Coles, Andrew. (2006). Generic types and their use in improving the quality of search heuristics. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 17(4). 471–8.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.