Andrew A. Neath

3.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
31 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Andrew A. Neath is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew A. Neath has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Statistics and Probability, 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 9 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Andrew A. Neath's work include Statistical Methods and Inference (16 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (14 papers). Andrew A. Neath is often cited by papers focused on Statistical Methods and Inference (16 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (14 papers). Andrew A. Neath collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Andrew A. Neath's co-authors include Joseph E. Cavanaugh, Francisco J. Samaniego, Simon Davies, Pamela Newland, Tom Burr, B.D. McVey, Neil C. Schwertman, Joseph Cavanaugh, Ryan Fries and Lin Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Statistical Association and The American Statistician.

In The Last Decade

Andrew A. Neath

29 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Testing Statistical Hypotheses 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2011 2019 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew A. Neath United States 11 550 392 177 151 146 31 2.3k
Christophe Ley Belgium 17 486 0.9× 559 1.4× 171 1.0× 134 0.9× 109 0.7× 86 4.1k
David M. Allen United States 21 737 1.3× 363 0.9× 138 0.8× 169 1.1× 235 1.6× 109 3.3k
S. L. Singapore 7 357 0.6× 440 1.1× 148 0.8× 127 0.8× 162 1.1× 9 2.0k
Clive Loader United States 14 787 1.4× 404 1.0× 276 1.6× 157 1.0× 157 1.1× 22 2.3k
Richard L. Scheaffer United States 23 622 1.1× 363 0.9× 223 1.3× 149 1.0× 213 1.5× 77 3.8k
Alvin C. Rencher United States 21 489 0.9× 405 1.0× 195 1.1× 155 1.0× 171 1.2× 32 3.7k
Alexander J. Collins United Kingdom 9 356 0.6× 257 0.7× 140 0.8× 65 0.4× 124 0.8× 16 2.5k
Michael R. Chernick United States 27 458 0.8× 234 0.6× 238 1.3× 149 1.0× 221 1.5× 67 3.4k
Scott D. Grimshaw United States 14 394 0.7× 311 0.8× 240 1.4× 213 1.4× 139 1.0× 33 2.2k
Manuel Febrero–Bande Spain 23 959 1.7× 547 1.4× 171 1.0× 276 1.8× 157 1.1× 66 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew A. Neath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew A. Neath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew A. Neath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew A. Neath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew A. Neath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew A. Neath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew A. Neath. The network helps show where Andrew A. Neath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew A. Neath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew A. Neath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew A. Neath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew A. Neath. Andrew A. Neath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cavanaugh, Joseph E. & Andrew A. Neath. (2019). The Akaike information criterion: Background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics. 11(3). 536 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Cavanaugh, Joseph E. & Andrew A. Neath. (2012). Model Selection Criteria Based on Computationally Intensive Estimators of the Expected Optimism. Journal | MESA. 3(4). 343–356.
3.
Neath, Andrew A., et al.. (2012). A Note on the Comparison of the Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches to Estimation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2012. 1–12. 1 indexed citations
4.
Neath, Andrew A., et al.. (2012). A bootstrap method for assessing uncertainty in Kullback-Leibler discrepancy model selection problems. Journal | MESA. 3(4). 381–391. 2 indexed citations
5.
Newland, Pamela, et al.. (2012). Symptom Clusters in Women With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 44(2). 66–71. 26 indexed citations
6.
Neath, Andrew A. & Joseph E. Cavanaugh. (2011). The Bayesian information criterion: background, derivation, and applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics. 4(2). 199–203. 615 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Burr, Tom, et al.. (2008). Performance of Variable Selection Methods in Regression Using Variations of the Bayesian Information Criterion. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 37(3). 507–520. 9 indexed citations
8.
Neath, Andrew A.. (2006). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 101(474). 847–848. 732 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Davies, Simon, Andrew A. Neath, & Joseph E. Cavanaugh. (2005). Cross validation model selection criteria for linear regression based on the Kullback–Leibler discrepancy. Statistical Methodology. 2(4). 249–266. 11 indexed citations
10.
Neath, Andrew A.. (2003). Polya tree distributions for statistical modeling of censored data. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences. 7(3). 175–186. 8 indexed citations
11.
Neath, Andrew A. & Joseph E. Cavanaugh. (2000). A regression model selection criterion based on bootstrap bumping for use with resistant fitting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 35(2). 155–169. 2 indexed citations
12.
Cavanaugh, Joseph E. & Andrew A. Neath. (1999). Generalizing the derivation of the schwarz information criterion. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods. 28(1). 49–66. 75 indexed citations
13.
Neath, Andrew A.. (1999). Bayesian Data Analysis. Journal of Quality Technology. 31(1). 127–127. 92 indexed citations
14.
Neath, Andrew A. & Joseph E. Cavanaugh. (1997). Regression and time series model selection using variants of the schwarz information criterion. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods. 26(3). 559–580. 59 indexed citations
15.
Neath, Andrew A. & Francisco J. Samaniego. (1997). On Bayesian estimation of the multiple decrement function in the competing risks problem, II: The discrete case. Statistics & Probability Letters. 35(4). 345–354.
16.
Neath, Andrew A. & Francisco J. Samaniego. (1997). On the Efficacy of Bayesian Inference for Nonidentifiable Models. The American Statistician. 51(3). 225–225. 20 indexed citations
17.
Neath, Andrew A. & Francisco J. Samaniego. (1997). On the Efficacy of Bayesian Inference for Nonidentifiable Models. The American Statistician. 51(3). 225–232. 43 indexed citations
18.
Samaniego, Francisco J. & Andrew A. Neath. (1996). How to Be a Better Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 91(434). 733–733. 4 indexed citations
19.
Neath, Andrew A. & Francisco J. Samaniego. (1996). On the distinguished role of the multivariate exponential distribution in Bayesian estimation in competing risks problems. Statistics & Probability Letters. 31(1). 69–74. 3 indexed citations
20.
Schwertman, Neil C., et al.. (1989). A monte carlo study of successive difference analysis of growth curve data at random observation times. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 34(1). 11–28. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026