Countries citing papers authored by Andreas van Cranenburgh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas van Cranenburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas van Cranenburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas van Cranenburgh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas van Cranenburgh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas van Cranenburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas van Cranenburgh. The network helps show where Andreas van Cranenburgh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andreas van Cranenburgh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andreas van Cranenburgh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andreas van Cranenburgh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andreas van Cranenburgh. Andreas van Cranenburgh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van, et al.. (2020). A Benchmark of Rule-Based and Neural Coreference Resolution in Dutch Novels and News.. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 79–90.2 indexed citations
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2019). A Dutch coreference resolution system with an evaluation on literary fiction. 9. 27–54.7 indexed citations
5.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2018). Cliche expressions in literary and genre novels. 34–43.1 indexed citations
6.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2018). Active DOP: A constituency treebank annotation tool with online learning. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 38–42.1 indexed citations
Cranenburgh, Andreas van, et al.. (2016). Topic modeling literary quality. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 233–237.4 indexed citations
11.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van, et al.. (2015). Identifying Literary Texts with Bigrams. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 58–67.10 indexed citations
12.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2014). Extraction of Phrase-Structure Fragments with a Linear Average Time Tree-Kernel. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 4. 3–16.4 indexed citations
Cranenburgh, Andreas van & Rens Bod. (2013). Discontinuous parsing with an efficient and accurate DOP model. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 7–16.16 indexed citations
15.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2012). Efficient parsing with Linear Context-Free Rewriting Systems. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 460–470.19 indexed citations
16.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van. (2012). Literary authorship attribution with phrase-structure fragments. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 59–63.14 indexed citations
Aloni, Maria, et al.. (2012). Building a Corpus of Indefinite Uses Annotated with Fine-grained Semantic Functions. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1511–1515.
19.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van, Remko Scha, & Federico Sangati. (2011). Discontinuous Data-Oriented Parsing: A mildly context-sensitive all-fragments grammar. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 34–44.9 indexed citations
20.
Cranenburgh, Andreas van, Galit W. Sassoon, & Raquel Fernández. (2010). Invented antonyms: Esperanto as a semantic lab. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.