Andrea L. Schaffer
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Oncology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sallie‐Anne PearsonTimothy DobbinsNicholas A. BuckleyBenjamin DanielsRose CairnsMelisa LitchfieldEmily A. KarangesBianca Blanch
- Topics
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (15 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers)Pain Management and Opioid Use (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIceland
In The Last Decade
Andrea L. Schaffer
71 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 354
- Epidemiology 285
- Economics and Econometrics 208
- Oncology 199
- General Health Professions 190
Countries citing papers authored by Andrea L. Schaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea L. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea L. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea L. Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea L. Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea L. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea L. Schaffer. The network helps show where Andrea L. Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea L. Schaffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea L. Schaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea L. Schaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea L. Schaffer. Andrea L. Schaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Andrea L. Schaffer
Andrea L. Schaffer is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (15 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (180 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (67 citations) and Family Practice (72 citations). Andrea L. Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Timothy Dobbins, Nicholas A. Buckley, Benjamin Daniels, Rose Cairns, Melisa Litchfield, Emily A. Karanges, Bianca Blanch, David Muscatello and Wayne Smith. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Pain and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.