András Angyal
About
In The Last Decade
András Angyal
4 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Clinical Psychology 82
- Social Psychology 71
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
- Applied Psychology 18
Countries citing papers authored by András Angyal
This map shows the geographic impact of András Angyal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by András Angyal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites András Angyal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by András Angyal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by András Angyal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by András Angyal. The network helps show where András Angyal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of András Angyal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of András Angyal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of András Angyal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with András Angyal. András Angyal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neurosis and Treatment: A Holistic Theory | 127 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 33 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.