Anaïs Meyer
About
In The Last Decade
Anaïs Meyer
5 papers receiving 155 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Sensory Systems 97
- Molecular Biology 64
- Otorhinolaryngology 47
- Neurology 45
- Cognitive Neuroscience 28
Countries citing papers authored by Anaïs Meyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Anaïs Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anaïs Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anaïs Meyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anaïs Meyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anaïs Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anaïs Meyer. The network helps show where Anaïs Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anaïs Meyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anaïs Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anaïs Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anaïs Meyer. Anaïs Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 103 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Validation of hearing results in tympanoplasty: a preliminary report. | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.