Ana Silva
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rossana PerroneO. MacadarLaura QuintanaPhilip K. StoddardBettina TassinoIgnacio EstevanÁngel A. CaputiLuís D. R. Melo
- Topics
- Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (44 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNature NeurosciencePLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- UruguayUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Ana Silva
94 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 860
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 428
- Ecology 358
- Social Psychology 273
- Cognitive Neuroscience 202
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Silva
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Silva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Silva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Silva. The network helps show where Ana Silva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Silva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Silva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Silva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Silva. Ana Silva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | Uso de espécies arbóreas em diferentes formações florestais de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil | 2 |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 95 | |
| 19 | 61 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Ana Silva
Ana Silva is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (44 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (860 citations), Developmental Biology (73 citations) and Aquatic Science (184 citations). Ana Silva has collaborated with scholars based in Uruguay, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Rossana Perrone, O. Macadar, Laura Quintana, Philip K. Stoddard, Bettina Tassino, Ignacio Estevan, Ángel A. Caputi, Luís D. R. Melo, Ana Oliveira and Sanna Sillankorva. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.