Ana Markić

726 citations
9 papers · 36 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ana Markić

7 papers receiving 35 citations

Peers

Ana Markić
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 7
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 2
  • Neurology 6
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 8
  • Surgery 13
Replace M. Veronesi with:
M. Veronesi United States
J. P. Mission France
Summit Bloria India
Gül Çakmak Türkiye
Julie Clark United States
Ilona Razlevičė Lithuania
David M. Sibell United States
Silvie Allaert Belgium
Mariangela Di Muro Italy
Antonio Morales Martínez Spain
Ana Markić relative to M. Veronesi United States M. Veronesi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Veronesi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Markić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Markić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Markić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Markić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Markić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Markić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Markić. The network helps show where Ana Markić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ana Markić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Markić Line = papers co-authored together Ana Markić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.
20129
2 20138
3
Thoracic epidural analgesia for radical cystectomy improves bowel function even in traditional perioperative care: a retrospective study in eighty-five patients.
20147
4 20124
5 20134
6
Bilateral vs. unilateral spinal anesthesia for varicose vein surgery in hypertensive patients
20112
7
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt].
20121
8
Extubation strategy following difficult intubation.
20121
9 20210

About Ana Markić

Ana Markić is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 36 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (7 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (2 citations), Neurology (6 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (8 citations) and Surgery (13 citations). Ana Markić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Višnja Nesek Adam, Marko Kovačević, Hrvoje Budinčević, Tatjana Goranović, Branka Maldini, Dragan Schwarz and Morena Milić. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Paediatria Croatica and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact