Ana M. Pires
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Genetics
- Plant Science
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Co-authors
- João A. BrancoCarla Santos PereiraVanda LourençoMatias KirstGraciela BoenteAna PicadoConceiçāo AmadoElsa Mendonça
- Topics
- Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (13 papers)Statistical Methods and Inference (8 papers)Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics and ProbabilityStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioinformaticsStatistics in Medicine
- Partner nations
- PortugalArgentinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ana M. Pires
30 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Statistics and Probability 80
- Artificial Intelligence 58
- Genetics 56
- Plant Science 44
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 36
Countries citing papers authored by Ana M. Pires
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana M. Pires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana M. Pires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana M. Pires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana M. Pires
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana M. Pires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana M. Pires. The network helps show where Ana M. Pires may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana M. Pires
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana M. Pires. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana M. Pires based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana M. Pires. Ana M. Pires is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | The gnathiids from the Brazilian southeastern continental shelf and slopec distributionc ecological notes and description of three new species lCrustaceac Isopodac Gnathiidaer | 13 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Ana M. Pires
Ana M. Pires is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Computational Mathematics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 32 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (8 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (80 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (33 citations). Ana M. Pires has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Argentina and United States. Frequent co-authors include João A. Branco, Carla Santos Pereira, Vanda Lourenço, Matias Kirst, Graciela Boente, Ana Picado, Conceiçāo Amado, Elsa Mendonça, Paul Tilyard and Craig Hardner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Bioinformatics and Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.