Amy T. Peters
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Scott A. LangeneckerRachel H. JacobsLouisa G. SylviaAndrew A. NierenbergAmy E. WestThilo DeckersbachEdward WatkinsMichael Berk
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (32 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amy T. Peters
62 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 591
- Psychiatry and Mental health 589
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 443
- Clinical Psychology 386
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 233
Countries citing papers authored by Amy T. Peters
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy T. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy T. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy T. Peters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy T. Peters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy T. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy T. Peters. The network helps show where Amy T. Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy T. Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy T. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy T. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy T. Peters. Amy T. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 77 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 88 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Amy T. Peters
Amy T. Peters is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (32 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (139 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (589 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (443 citations). Amy T. Peters has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Langenecker, Rachel H. Jacobs, Louisa G. Sylvia, Andrew A. Nierenberg, Amy E. West, Thilo Deckersbach, Edward Watkins, Michael Berk, Olusola Ajilore and Sally M. Weinstein. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.