Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study
2004465 citationsGeorge Demiris, Marilyn Rantz et al.Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Dorman Marek
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Dorman Marek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Dorman Marek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Dorman Marek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Dorman Marek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Dorman Marek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Dorman Marek. The network helps show where Karen Dorman Marek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Dorman Marek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Dorman Marek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Dorman Marek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Dorman Marek. Karen Dorman Marek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Popejoy, Lori, Colleen Galambos, Frank Stetzer, et al.. (2016). Comparing Aging in Place to Home Health Care: Impact of Nurse Care Coordination On Utilization and Costs.. PubMed. 33(6). 306–13.20 indexed citations
Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (2012). Zapas węgla organicznego w glebach leśnych zespołu kontynentalnego boru mieszanego świeżego w Kampinoskim Parku Narodowym. Soil Science Annual. 63(4).3 indexed citations
9.
Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (2009). Zanieczyszczenie środowiska glebowego przez oleje mineralne w otoczeniu stacji paliw na terenie aglomeracji warszawskiej. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych.1 indexed citations
10.
Westra, Bonnie L., Karen Dorman Marek, Kay Savik, et al.. (2008). Defining medication complexity and its effect on outcomes in community dwelling elders receiving home care.. PubMed. 930–930.1 indexed citations
11.
Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (2007). Ocena stopnia zanieczyszczenia gleb aglomeracji warszawskiej przez metale ciężkie i WWA na podstawie różnych norm prawnych. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 520(2).2 indexed citations
Marek, Karen Dorman, et al.. (2004). Dependence of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content on selected properties of soils in the vicinity of petrol stations. Chemia i Inżynieria Ekologiczna. 11. 735–741.1 indexed citations
Demiris, George, Marilyn Rantz, Myra A. Aud, et al.. (2004). Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine. 29(2). 87–94.465 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.