Amy C. Bennett

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 731 citations indexed

About

Amy C. Bennett is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy C. Bennett has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 731 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Amy C. Bennett's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers). Amy C. Bennett is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers). Amy C. Bennett collaborates with scholars based in United States, Panama and Australia. Amy C. Bennett's co-authors include Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira, Craig D. Allen, N. G. McDowell, William J. McShea, Jennifer C. McGarvey, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Erika Gonzalez‐Akre, Valentine Herrmann, Norman A. Bourg and Jonathan R. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Functional Ecology, Nature Plants and IUBMB Life.

In The Last Decade

Amy C. Bennett

6 papers receiving 722 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide

2015 661 citations Amy C. Bennett, N. G. McDowell et al. Nature Plants profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy C. Bennett United States	5	598	498	342	92	81	6	731
Adriane Esquivel‐Muelbert United Kingdom	11	451 0.8×	403 0.8×	177 0.5×	121 1.3×	87 1.1×	29	673
Raquel Alfaro‐Sánchez Spain	16	633 1.1×	400 0.8×	330 1.0×	138 1.5×	50 0.6×	37	737
Tatiana A. Shestakova Spain	16	552 0.9×	325 0.7×	428 1.3×	138 1.5×	70 0.9×	37	662
Stefan Klesse Switzerland	19	890 1.5×	607 1.2×	815 2.4×	79 0.9×	96 1.2×	31	1.1k
M. Ross Alexander United States	11	578 1.0×	405 0.8×	451 1.3×	104 1.1×	52 0.6×	16	705
Éster González de Andrés Spain	15	462 0.8×	395 0.8×	332 1.0×	87 0.9×	137 1.7×	54	638
Antoine Cabon Spain	12	600 1.0×	403 0.8×	424 1.2×	71 0.8×	91 1.1×	20	687
Elisabeth Pötzelsberger Austria	14	350 0.6×	297 0.6×	125 0.4×	99 1.1×	111 1.4×	17	536
Morgane Urli Canada	8	574 1.0×	342 0.7×	321 0.9×	111 1.2×	252 3.1×	12	705
Alicia Forner Spain	11	388 0.6×	190 0.4×	198 0.6×	79 0.9×	144 1.8×	14	501

Countries citing papers authored by Amy C. Bennett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy C. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy C. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy C. Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy C. Bennett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy C. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy C. Bennett. The network helps show where Amy C. Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy C. Bennett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy C. Bennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy C. Bennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy C. Bennett. Amy C. Bennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Bennett, Amy C., et al.. (2023). Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair (STABILISE): A Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 98. 146–154. 7 indexed citations

2.

Esquivel‐Muelbert, Adriane, Amy C. Bennett, Martin J. P. Sullivan, et al.. (2019). A Spatial and Temporal Risk Assessment of the Impacts of El Niño on the Tropical Forest Carbon Cycle: Theoretical Framework, Scenarios, and Implications. Atmosphere. 10(10). 588–588. 4 indexed citations

3.

Bennett, Amy C., N. G. McDowell, Craig D. Allen, & Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira. (2015). Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nature Plants. 1(10). 15139–15139. 661 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Anderson‐Teixeira, Kristina J., Jennifer C. McGarvey, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, et al.. (2015). Size‐related scaling of tree form and function in a mixed‐age forest. Functional Ecology. 29(12). 1587–1602. 43 indexed citations

5.

Bennett, Amy C.. (2008). A decade of change in the birds of a Victorian box-ironbark forest. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 18(4). 20–20. 5 indexed citations

6.

Bennett, Amy C., et al.. (1997). Comparison of SSCP analysis and CFLP analysis for mutation detection in the human iduronate 2‐sulfatase gene. IUBMB Life. 43(6). 1163–1171. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact