Amy A. Abbott

26 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Amy A. Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Research and Theory 21
  • Health Information Management 75
  • Leadership and Management 14
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • Emergency Medical Services 40
Replace Li‐Chi Huang with:
Li‐Chi Huang Taiwan
Emine Türkmen Türkiye
Hwey‐Fang Liang Taiwan
Susan McBride United States
Ghadeer Al-Dweik Jordan
Elizabeth Horsley United States
Majed Mowanes Alruwaili Saudi Arabia
Hairong Yu China
Reema Safadi Jordan
H. Feldman United States
Amy A. Abbott relative to Li‐Chi Huang Taiwan Li‐Chi Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Li‐Chi Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy A. Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy A. Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy A. Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy A. Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy A. Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy A. Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy A. Abbott. The network helps show where Amy A. Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy A. Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy A. Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Amy A. Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200175
2 201258
3 200642
4 201037
5 201228
6 201524
7 200723
8 201219
9 201018
10 201016
11 201315
12 201512
13 20129
14 20108
15 20227
16 20144
17 20174
18
A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION OF STANDALONE PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD USE BY PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES
20213
19 20223
20 20222

About Amy A. Abbott

Amy A. Abbott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Health Information Management, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 29 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (21 citations), Health Information Management (75 citations), Leadership and Management (14 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (40 citations). Amy A. Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin T. Fuji, Kimberly A. Galt, Tanja Taivassalo, Ronald G. Haller, Joan Norris, Phil Wyrick, Karen A. Paschal, Susan Barnason, Lani Zimmerman and Andjela Drincic. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Nurse Educator, The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact