Amina Wadud

1.2k citations
14 papers · 586 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Amina Wadud

13 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Amina Wadud
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Political Science and International Relations 351
  • Sociology and Political Science 458
  • Gender Studies 89
  • Religious studies 23
  • Anthropology 39
Replace Ziba Mir‐Hosseini with:
Ziba Mir‐Hosseini United Kingdom
Nadia Fadil Belgium
Beth Baron United States
Khaled Abou El Fadl United States
Roxanne L. Euben United States
Muhammad Qasim Zaman United States
Line Nyhagen United Kingdom
Elizabeth Shakman Hurd United States
James Piscatori Australia
Haideh Moghissi Canada
Amina Wadud relative to Ziba Mir‐Hosseini United Kingdom Ziba Mir‐Hosseini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ziba Mir‐Hosseini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Wadud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Wadud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Wadud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Wadud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Wadud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Wadud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Wadud. The network helps show where Amina Wadud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Amina Wadud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina Wadud Line = papers co-authored together Amina Wadud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000306
2
Inside the Gender Jihad: Women's Reform in Islam
2006120
3 200061
4
Qur'an and Woman
199228
5 199521
6 202117
7 200410
8 20088
9 20005
10 20164
11 20133
12
Roundtable On Feminist Ideology And Religious Diversity, Part 5: Feminist Theology, Religiously Diverse Neighborhood Or Christian Ghetto?
20001
13
Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (review)
20061
14 20061

About Amina Wadud

Amina Wadud is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (9 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (4 papers), Families in Therapy and Culture (3 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (3 papers), Hispanic-African Historical Relations (1 paper), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (351 citations), Sociology and Political Science (458 citations), Gender Studies (89 citations), Religious studies (23 citations) and Anthropology (39 citations). Amina Wadud has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Gisela Webb, Ziba Mir‐Hosseini, Sylviane A. Diouf, Carol P. Christ, Yvonne Chireau and Susan Starr Sered. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and Religion, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Religions and International Feminist Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact