Ami Rokach

125 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ami Rokach
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 216
  • Health 924
  • Social Psychology 838
  • Clinical Psychology 763
  • General Health Professions 719
Replace Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton with:
Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton United States
Susan H. McFadden United States
Peter G. Coleman United Kingdom
Thomas Hansen Norway
Aloen L. Townsend United States
Alan Vaux United States
Brian Lakey United States
Katia Levecque Belgium
Karen D. Lincoln United States
Rebecca Utz United States
Ami Rokach relative to Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton United States Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Rokach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Rokach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Rokach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Rokach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Rokach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Rokach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Rokach. The network helps show where Ami Rokach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ami Rokach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ami Rokach Line = papers co-authored together Ami Rokach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998112
2 199087
3 198886
4 198984
5 199765
6 200065
7 200564
8 201661
9 200459
10 200557
11 201856
12
Loneliness: A multidimensional experience.
199752
13 200450
14 199949
15 200648
16 201146
17 200146
18 200141
19 200037
20 200733

About Ami Rokach

Ami Rokach is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 132 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (51 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (34 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (15 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (11 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (216 citations), Health (924 citations), Social Psychology (838 citations), Clinical Psychology (763 citations) and General Health Professions (719 citations). Ami Rokach has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. B. Heather, Félix Neto, Tricia Orzeck, Miguel Moya, Francisca Expósito, Michaela Bercovitch, Zvjezdan Penezić, Debra J. Vandervoort, Alison Rose and David S. Berman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Psychology, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, Social Indicators Research, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Emerging Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact