Amel Bennaceur

28 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Amel Bennaceur
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Software 20
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Human-Computer Interaction 17
  • Information Systems 58
  • Computer Networks and Communications 49
Replace Jocelyn Manderveld with:
Jocelyn Manderveld Netherlands
Irwin Reyes United States
Shubham Atreja United States
Garrett Powell United States
Sai Teja Peddinti United States
Richard Glassey Sweden
George V. Neville-Neil United States
Juha Taina Finland
Eric Zeng United States
Daniel Smullen United States
Amel Bennaceur relative to Jocelyn Manderveld Netherlands Jocelyn Manderveld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Jocelyn Manderveld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amel Bennaceur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amel Bennaceur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amel Bennaceur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amel Bennaceur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amel Bennaceur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amel Bennaceur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amel Bennaceur. The network helps show where Amel Bennaceur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amel Bennaceur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amel Bennaceur Line = papers co-authored together Amel Bennaceur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202227
2 201424
3 201223
4 202014
5 202211
6 202311
7 20189
8 20157
9 20187
10 20185
11 20235
12 20094
13 20224
14 20233
15 20193
16 20213
17 20223
18
On the Learnability of i ⇤ : Experiences from a New Teacher
20153
19 20232
20 20232

About Amel Bennaceur

Amel Bennaceur is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (9 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (8 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (4 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (20 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (17 citations), Information Systems (58 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (49 citations). Amel Bennaceur has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Valérie Issarny, Bashar Nuseibeh, Mark Levine, Arosha K. Bandara, Gordon S. Blair, Nelly Bencomo, Paul Grace, Karl Meinke, Avelie Stuart and Blaine Price. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Communications of the ACM, ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Geophysical Research Planets.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact