Amber R. Comer

578 total citations
37 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Amber R. Comer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber R. Comer has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amber R. Comer's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers). Amber R. Comer is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers). Amber R. Comer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Australia. Amber R. Comer's co-authors include Eli N. Perencevich, Marianne S. Matthias, Daniel J. Livorsi, Matthew J. Bair, Alexia M. Torke, Jason M. Organ, Niki Munk, James E. Slaven, Kristine K. Miller and Lynda T Goodfellow and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Stroke and The American Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Amber R. Comer

31 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amber R. Comer United States 9 147 119 102 54 34 37 339
Rachel Rutz Voumard Switzerland 10 159 1.1× 67 0.6× 52 0.5× 63 1.2× 35 1.0× 19 364
So Sun Kim South Korea 12 78 0.5× 117 1.0× 95 0.9× 42 0.8× 25 0.7× 24 406
Esmaeil Mohammadnejad Iran 10 40 0.3× 60 0.5× 22 0.2× 21 0.4× 22 0.6× 44 332
Thomas Kuehlein Germany 11 48 0.3× 180 1.5× 31 0.3× 134 2.5× 13 0.4× 24 491
Erika A. Saliba‐Gustafsson United States 9 108 0.7× 128 1.1× 84 0.8× 42 0.8× 30 0.9× 22 291
Madge E. Buus‐Frank United States 11 178 1.2× 113 0.9× 55 0.5× 105 1.9× 22 0.6× 26 673
Elsa Afonso United Kingdom 8 46 0.3× 30 0.3× 23 0.2× 95 1.8× 23 0.7× 13 388
Joan Lynch Australia 13 44 0.3× 42 0.4× 18 0.2× 56 1.0× 16 0.5× 25 507
Nadia J. Chaves Australia 9 87 0.6× 125 1.1× 38 0.4× 48 0.9× 48 1.4× 12 353
Didier Schoevaerdts Belgium 12 33 0.2× 65 0.5× 58 0.6× 128 2.4× 10 0.3× 38 474

Countries citing papers authored by Amber R. Comer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber R. Comer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber R. Comer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber R. Comer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber R. Comer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber R. Comer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber R. Comer. The network helps show where Amber R. Comer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber R. Comer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber R. Comer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber R. Comer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber R. Comer. Amber R. Comer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Comer, Amber R.. (2025). Which Values Should Guide Evidence-Based Practice?. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 27(1). E21–26. 1 indexed citations
2.
Comer, Amber R.. (2025). Alone, Handcuffed to a Bed Awaiting Surgery. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 27(4). E298–301.
3.
Comer, Amber R., et al.. (2024). Disparities in end-of-life care for racial minorities: a narrative review. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 13(2). 309–321. 8 indexed citations
4.
Torke, Alexia M., Emily Burke, Amber R. Comer, et al.. (2024). Improving Outcomes for ICU Family Members: The Role of Spiritual Care. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 28(4). 538–548. 2 indexed citations
5.
Creutzfeldt, Claire J., Amber R. Comer, Susan Enguídanos, et al.. (2024). Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Stroke. 56(2). e75–e86. 1 indexed citations
6.
Powell, Colin, et al.. (2024). Implementing Goals of Care Notes in a Statewide Health System: A Quality Improvement Initiative. The American Journal of Medicine. 138(5). 782–788.
7.
Comer, Amber R., et al.. (2024). The impact of sex and gender on advanced stroke interventions and end-of-life outcomes after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 33(8). 107820–107820. 1 indexed citations
8.
Comer, Amber R., et al.. (2023). Code Status Orders: Do the Options Matter?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 38(9). 2069–2075. 2 indexed citations
9.
Comer, Amber R., et al.. (2023). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scoring inconsistencies between neurologists and emergency room nurses. Frontiers in Neurology. 13. 1093392–1093392. 3 indexed citations
10.
Comer, Amber R., et al.. (2023). Code status orders in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Resuscitation Plus. 15. 100452–100452. 1 indexed citations
11.
Comer, Amber R., Linda S. Williams, Robert G. Holloway, et al.. (2022). Palliative and End-of-Life Care After Severe Stroke. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 63(5). 721–728. 11 indexed citations
12.
Organ, Jason M. & Amber R. Comer. (2022). Evolution of a discipline—The changing face of anatomy. The Anatomical Record. 305(4). 766–771. 13 indexed citations
13.
Comer, Amber R.. (2022). The evolving ethics of anatomy: Dissecting an unethical past in order to prepare for a future of ethical anatomical practice. The Anatomical Record. 305(4). 818–826. 22 indexed citations
14.
Munk, Niki, Lynda T Goodfellow, Kristine K. Miller, et al.. (2021). Determinants of Telerehabilitation Acceptance among Patients Attending Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs in the United States. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(3). 230–234. 8 indexed citations
15.
Comer, Amber R., Alexia M. Torke, Susan E. Hickman, et al.. (2020). Discordance Between Surrogate Goals of Care and Medical Treatments Received By Hospitalized Older Adults (S769). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 59(2). 568–569.
16.
Munk, Niki, et al.. (2020). Massage perceptions and attitudes of undergraduate pre-professional health sciences students: a cross-sectional survey in one U.S. university. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 20(1). 213–213. 4 indexed citations
17.
Munk, Niki, Lynda T Goodfellow, Kristine K. Miller, et al.. (2020). Health Care Practitioners’ Determinants of Telerehabilitation Acceptance. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 12(1). 43–50. 23 indexed citations
18.
Comer, Amber R., Teresa M. Damush, Alexia M. Torke, & Linda S. Williams. (2019). The Role of Informed Consent for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.. PubMed. 30(4). 338–346. 3 indexed citations
19.
Burggraeve, Roger, et al.. (2017). Healthcare ethics for Healthcare Practitioners. OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation).
20.
Livorsi, Daniel J., Amber R. Comer, Marianne S. Matthias, Eli N. Perencevich, & Matthew J. Bair. (2015). Factors Influencing Antibiotic-Prescribing Decisions Among Inpatient Physicians: A Qualitative Investigation. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 36(9). 1065–1072. 113 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Rutz Voumard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by So Sun Kim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Esmaeil Mohammadnejad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Kuehlein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erika A. Saliba‐Gustafsson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Madge E. Buus‐Frank Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elsa Afonso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joan Lynch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadia J. Chaves Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Didier Schoevaerdts
Rankless by CCL
2026