Amber N. Stokes

29 total papers · 589 total citations
26 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Amber N. Stokes is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Ocean Engineering and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber N. Stokes has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 9 papers in Ocean Engineering and 8 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Amber N. Stokes's work include Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (19 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (9 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (8 papers). Amber N. Stokes is often cited by papers focused on Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (19 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (9 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (8 papers). Amber N. Stokes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Malawi. Amber N. Stokes's co-authors include Edmund D. Brodie, Susannah S. French, Edmund D. Brodie, Brian G. Gall, Becky L. Williams, Charles T. Hanifin, Michael E. Pfrender, Lorin A. Neuman‐Lee, Chris R. Feldman and Peter K. Ducey and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Amber N. Stokes

24 papers receiving 446 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amber N. Stokes 201 132 121 117 83 26 451
Becky L. Williams 283 1.4× 144 1.1× 96 0.8× 103 0.9× 147 1.8× 16 509
Cynthia E. Kicklighter 44 0.2× 72 0.5× 154 1.3× 47 0.4× 146 1.8× 13 481
Darren Yeo 65 0.3× 104 0.8× 289 2.4× 66 0.6× 116 1.4× 26 512
Silvia Battistella 29 0.1× 55 0.4× 80 0.7× 38 0.3× 50 0.6× 18 417
Ann M. Cameron 43 0.2× 103 0.8× 162 1.3× 79 0.7× 37 0.4× 21 463
Maya Lalzar 31 0.2× 166 1.3× 195 1.6× 52 0.4× 30 0.4× 36 522
D. K. Hofmann 84 0.4× 46 0.3× 235 1.9× 185 1.6× 58 0.7× 21 511
Daniel S. Grosch 40 0.2× 69 0.5× 117 1.0× 31 0.3× 58 0.7× 53 443
Anne Thielsch 193 1.0× 42 0.3× 260 2.1× 27 0.2× 55 0.7× 15 424
W. Decleir 52 0.3× 34 0.3× 233 1.9× 50 0.4× 118 1.4× 45 552

Countries citing papers authored by Amber N. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber N. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber N. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber N. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber N. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber N. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber N. Stokes. The network helps show where Amber N. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber N. Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber N. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber N. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber N. Stokes. Amber N. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026