Amber L. Pitt
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Water Science and Technology
- Environmental Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Robert F. BaldwinMax A. NickersonJunjian WangAlex ChowXubiao YuBryan L. BrownStephen F. SpearDonald J. Lipscomb
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers)Turtle Biology and Conservation (6 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEWater Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amber L. Pitt
23 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Ecology 134
- Global and Planetary Change 114
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 99
- Water Science and Technology 48
- Environmental Chemistry 31
Countries citing papers authored by Amber L. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber L. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber L. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber L. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber L. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber L. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber L. Pitt. The network helps show where Amber L. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber L. Pitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber L. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber L. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber L. Pitt. Amber L. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Movement ecology and habitat use of three sympatric anuran species. | 5 |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 12. Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi (Ozark Hellbender): larval habitat and retreat behaviour | 1 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 69 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Amber L. Pitt
Amber L. Pitt is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 26 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (6 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (99 citations), Ecological Modeling (28 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (114 citations). Amber L. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Baldwin, Max A. Nickerson, Junjian Wang, Alex Chow, Xubiao Yu, Bryan L. Brown, Stephen F. Spear, Donald J. Lipscomb, Paul B. Leonard and Thomas A. Waldrop. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Water Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.