Amber L. Pitt

36 total papers · 511 total citations
26 papers, 247 citations indexed

About

Amber L. Pitt is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber L. Pitt has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 247 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 11 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Amber L. Pitt's work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers) and Turtle Biology and Conservation (6 papers). Amber L. Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers) and Turtle Biology and Conservation (6 papers). Amber L. Pitt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Amber L. Pitt's co-authors include Robert F. Baldwin, Max A. Nickerson, Alex Chow, Junjian Wang, Xubiao Yu, Bryan L. Brown, Stephen F. Spear, Donald J. Lipscomb, Paul B. Leonard and Thomas A. Waldrop and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Water Research.

In The Last Decade

Amber L. Pitt

23 papers receiving 242 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amber L. Pitt 132 113 98 48 31 26 247
K.M. Trayler 182 1.4× 68 0.6× 105 1.1× 37 0.8× 70 2.3× 18 315
Robyn L. Irvine 167 1.3× 51 0.5× 118 1.2× 39 0.8× 19 0.6× 21 250
Rosi Dagit 166 1.3× 139 1.2× 107 1.1× 47 1.0× 11 0.4× 17 271
Akiko Nagasaka 151 1.1× 66 0.6× 118 1.2× 62 1.3× 31 1.0× 19 267
Marian Tudor 122 0.9× 150 1.3× 56 0.6× 32 0.7× 21 0.7× 31 327
John F. Bunnell 186 1.4× 113 1.0× 104 1.1× 53 1.1× 38 1.2× 22 314
Shay Howlin 212 1.6× 103 0.9× 118 1.2× 20 0.4× 16 0.5× 14 279
Ernie F. Hain 171 1.3× 90 0.8× 160 1.6× 80 1.7× 26 0.8× 16 321
Trevor A. Middel 158 1.2× 74 0.7× 180 1.8× 24 0.5× 14 0.5× 19 277
David C. Simon 167 1.3× 69 0.6× 140 1.4× 28 0.6× 9 0.3× 24 282

Countries citing papers authored by Amber L. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber L. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber L. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber L. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber L. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber L. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber L. Pitt. The network helps show where Amber L. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber L. Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber L. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber L. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber L. Pitt. Amber L. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026