Amber Conrad

744 total citations
7 papers, 206 citations indexed

About

Amber Conrad is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber Conrad has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 206 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Amber Conrad's work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers). Amber Conrad is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers). Amber Conrad collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Amber Conrad's co-authors include Stephen D. Mastrian, Robert E. Blankenship, Jeffrey W. Touchman, Wesley D. Swingley, Heather Taylor, Maeve O’Huallachain, Chaitanya R. Acharya, J. Thomas Beatty, Ronald S. Go and Barbara M. Honchak and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Bacteriology and European Journal Of Haematology.

In The Last Decade

Amber Conrad

7 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amber Conrad United States	4	139	136	35	29	19	7	206
Willow Coyote‐Maestas United States	11	249 1.8×	85 0.6×	33 0.9×	15 0.5×	14 0.7×	17	350
Stephen D. Mastrian United States	6	197 1.4×	151 1.1×	35 1.0×	32 1.1×	20 1.1×	8	277
Charlotte Rehm Germany	7	189 1.4×	85 0.6×	55 1.6×	36 1.2×	5 0.3×	8	293
Huazhi Han United States	7	307 2.2×	52 0.4×	11 0.3×	13 0.4×	44 2.3×	8	370
О. И. Кеппен Russia	9	191 1.4×	160 1.2×	22 0.6×	34 1.2×	35 1.8×	24	264
Hana Medová Czechia	8	163 1.2×	217 1.6×	98 2.8×	32 1.1×	17 0.9×	11	324
Daniel Kurtz United States	5	165 1.2×	117 0.9×	25 0.7×	7 0.2×	10 0.5×	9	265
Thomas Vannier France	7	154 1.1×	148 1.1×	56 1.6×	14 0.5×	3 0.2×	9	234
Charlotte Nef France	6	76 0.5×	72 0.5×	27 0.8×	34 1.2×	7 0.4×	12	128
Antonio López‐Lozano Spain	11	171 1.2×	180 1.3×	110 3.1×	46 1.6×	15 0.8×	15	266

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Conrad

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Conrad

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Conrad. The network helps show where Amber Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Conrad

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Conrad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Conrad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Conrad. Amber Conrad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Pierobon, Mariaelena, Nicholas J. Robert, Donald W. Northfelt, et al.. (2018). Multi-omic profiling of metastatic lesions to guide treatment selection: The Side Out 2 trial experience.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36(15_suppl). 1077–1077. 3 indexed citations

Conrad, Amber, et al.. (2012). Utility of Routine Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Measurement Before Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Oncology Practice. 8(6). 336–340. 9 indexed citations

Halmos, Balázs, Pin‐Kuei Fu, Nathan A. Pennell, et al.. (2011). Erlotinib beyond progression study: Randomized phase II study comparing chemotherapy plus erlotinib with chemotherapy alone in EGFR TKI-responsive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that subsequently progresses.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 29(15_suppl). TPS211–TPS211. 1 indexed citations

Conrad, Amber & Ronald S. Go. (2009). Contralateral testicular relapse after prophylactic radiation in a patient with primary testicular diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. European Journal Of Haematology. 83(6). 603–605. 5 indexed citations

Sattley, W. Matthew, Michael T. Madigan, Wesley D. Swingley, et al.. (2008). The Genome of Heliobacterium modesticaldum , a Phototrophic Representative of the Firmicutes Containing the Simplest Photosynthetic Apparatus. Journal of Bacteriology. 190(13). 4687–4696. 70 indexed citations

Swingley, Wesley D., Stephen D. Mastrian, Chaitanya R. Acharya, et al.. (2006). The Complete Genome Sequence of Roseobacter denitrificans Reveals a Mixotrophic Rather than Photosynthetic Metabolism. Journal of Bacteriology. 189(3). 683–690. 116 indexed citations

Meden, H., et al.. (1996). Improved control of nausea and emesis with a new bromazepam-containing ondansetron regimen in ovarian cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with carboplatin and cyclophosphamide.. PubMed. 17(2). 114–22. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact