Amanda Wraith

444 total citations
9 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Amanda Wraith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Wraith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Wraith's work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers). Amanda Wraith is often cited by papers focused on Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers). Amanda Wraith collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Switzerland and United States. Amanda Wraith's co-authors include Dan Larhammar, Magnus Berglund, Ingrid Lundell, Sara K.S. Holmberg, Charlotte Söderberg, Maria Ringvall, Yi‐Lin Yan, John H. Postlethwait, Lennart Brodin and Ann‐Kristin Arvidsson and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Neurochemistry and General and Comparative Endocrinology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Wraith

9 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Wraith Sweden	6	248	143	137	31	25	9	296
Oliver Mai Germany	8	64 0.3×	100 0.7×	162 1.2×	18 0.6×	21 0.8×	9	382
Marc Bulant France	15	254 1.0×	103 0.7×	134 1.0×	28 0.9×	16 0.6×	24	439
Shuping Wen Germany	5	57 0.2×	27 0.2×	135 1.0×	16 0.5×	25 1.0×	8	317
Yoshiko Iwasaki Japan	8	244 1.0×	91 0.6×	91 0.7×	56 1.8×	12 0.5×	9	436
Yasuko Horikoshi Japan	8	273 1.1×	229 1.6×	271 2.0×	25 0.8×	18 0.7×	9	692
Qingping Jiang China	5	191 0.8×	104 0.7×	125 0.9×	23 0.7×	7 0.3×	9	326
Carol Taylor‐Burds United States	7	64 0.3×	33 0.2×	91 0.7×	11 0.4×	48 1.9×	8	295
David Cronk United Kingdom	5	193 0.8×	47 0.3×	173 1.3×	10 0.3×	3 0.1×	6	282
Alejandro Núñez Mexico	6	133 0.5×	27 0.2×	107 0.8×	13 0.4×	8 0.3×	14	261
J.A. Boudier France	12	164 0.7×	23 0.2×	238 1.7×	14 0.5×	7 0.3×	19	383

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Wraith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Wraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Wraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Wraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Wraith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Wraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Wraith. The network helps show where Amanda Wraith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Wraith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Wraith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Wraith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Wraith. Amanda Wraith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Larhammar, Dan, Amanda Wraith, Magnus Berglund, Sara K.S. Holmberg, & Ingrid Lundell. (2001). Origins of the many NPY-family receptors in mammals. Peptides. 22(3). 295–307. 97 indexed citations

2.

Söderberg, Charlotte, Amanda Wraith, Maria Ringvall, et al.. (2000). Zebrafish Genes for Neuropeptide Y and Peptide YY Reveal Origin by Chromosome Duplication from an Ancestral Gene Linked to the Homeobox Cluster. Journal of Neurochemistry. 75(3). 908–918. 62 indexed citations

3.

Wraith, Amanda, et al.. (2000). Neuropeptide Y Receptor Gene y6: Multiple Deaths or Resurrections?. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 277(1). 264–269. 56 indexed citations

4.

Sharma, Parul, Ann‐Kristin Arvidsson, Amanda Wraith, et al.. (1999). Characterization of the Cloned Atlantic Cod Neuropeptide Y-Yb Receptor: Peptide-Binding Requirements Distinct from Known Mammalian Y Receptors. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 115(3). 422–428. 11 indexed citations

5.

Lundell, Ingrid, Robert Fredriksson, Magnus Berglund, et al.. (1999). Neuropeptide Y receptor subtype with unique properties cloned in the zebrafish: the zYa receptor. Molecular Brain Research. 70(2). 242–252. 39 indexed citations

6.

Wraith, Amanda. (1999). Molecular Evolution of the Neuropeptide Y Receptor Family: Insights from Mammals and Fish. 5 indexed citations

7.

Arvidsson, Ann‐Kristin, Amanda Wraith, Ann‐Cathrine Jönsson‐Rylander, & Dan Larhammar. (1998). Cloning of a neuropeptide Y/peptide YY receptor from the atlantic cod: the Yb receptor. Regulatory Peptides. 75-76. 39–43. 23 indexed citations

8.

Törnsten, Anna, Amanda Wraith, Dan Larhammar, & B.P. Chowdhary. (1998). FISH mapping of the porcine NPY5 gene to Chromosome 8p11. Mammalian Genome. 9(3). 262–263. 1 indexed citations

9.

Larhammar, Dan, Ingrid Lundell, Erik Salaneck, et al.. (1997). Evolution of neuropeptide Y and its receptors. 551. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact