Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Stent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Stent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Stent more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Stent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Stent. The network helps show where Amanda Stent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Stent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Stent.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Stent based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Stent. Amanda Stent is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kumar, Yaman, Junyi Jessy Li, Debanjan Mahata, et al.. (2020). An Annotated Dataset of Discourse Modes in Hindi Stories. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1191–1196.3 indexed citations
Mehdad, Yashar, et al.. (2016). Extractive Summarization under Strict Length Constraints.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 3089–3093.2 indexed citations
Jung, Hyuckchul & Amanda Stent. (2013). ATT1: Temporal Annotation Using Big Windows and Rich Syntactic and Semantic Features. Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. 20–24.10 indexed citations
8.
Belz, Anja, et al.. (2011). The First Surface Realisation Shared Task: Overview and Evaluation Results. University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton). 217–226.58 indexed citations
Belz, Anja, Michael White, Josef van Genabith, Deirdre Hogan, & Amanda Stent. (2010). Finding common ground: towards a surface realisation shared task. University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton). 268–272.3 indexed citations
12.
Johnston, Michael & Amanda Stent. (2010). EPG. 257–258.2 indexed citations
Walker, Marilyn, Steve Whittaker, Amanda Stent, et al.. (2002). Speech-Plans: Generating Evaluative Responses in Spoken Dialogue. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh). 73–80.20 indexed citations
Allen, James F., Donna Byron, Myroslava O. Dzikovska, et al.. (2000). An architecture for a generic dialogue shell. Natural Language Engineering. 6(3-4). 213–228.102 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.