Amanda Rush

989 total citations
26 papers, 325 citations indexed

About

Amanda Rush is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Rush has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 325 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in Physiology and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Amanda Rush's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (17 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers). Amanda Rush is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (17 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers). Amanda Rush collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Amanda Rush's co-authors include Jennifer A. Byrne, Peter H. Watson, Patrick Breheny, Daniel Catchpoole, Jonas J. Astrin, Ashokkumar A. Patel, Yvonne DeSouza, Lori Campbell, Andrew Searles and Rod Ling and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Genetics, The Journal of Pediatrics and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Rush

23 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Rush Australia	11	170	83	58	56	49	26	325
Carol J. Weil United States	8	244 1.4×	132 1.6×	41 0.7×	48 0.9×	40 0.8×	22	351
Jilles M. Fermont United Kingdom	8	33 0.2×	61 0.7×	37 0.6×	81 1.4×	66 1.3×	11	400
Nicole C. Lockhart United States	10	210 1.2×	110 1.3×	49 0.8×	60 1.1×	124 2.5×	16	425
Martina Loibner Austria	9	46 0.3×	33 0.4×	14 0.2×	18 0.3×	63 1.3×	18	308
Simona Baselice Italy	5	99 0.6×	44 0.5×	20 0.3×	50 0.9×	72 1.5×	7	276
Cheryl Marriott United Kingdom	3	97 0.6×	33 0.4×	41 0.7×	29 0.5×	99 2.0×	5	264
Wendy Selig United States	9	48 0.3×	44 0.5×	85 1.5×	33 0.6×	18 0.4×	16	289
Mohammad Houshyari Iran	11	61 0.4×	37 0.4×	8 0.1×	30 0.5×	31 0.6×	38	319
Yi‐Ping Lin Taiwan	10	38 0.2×	14 0.2×	17 0.3×	46 0.8×	94 1.9×	23	321
Donna A. Messner United States	11	69 0.4×	36 0.4×	102 1.8×	34 0.6×	30 0.6×	23	327

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Rush

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Rush

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Rush. The network helps show where Amanda Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Rush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Rush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Rush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Rush. Amanda Rush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rush, Amanda, Jennifer A. Byrne, & Peter H. Watson. (2025). Guideline on Valuation of Research Biospecimen Collections. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 24(1). 7–14. 1 indexed citations

Dong, Xu, et al.. (2025). A scoping review of models of care and services for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 25(1). 1012–1012.

McCalman, Janya, et al.. (2025). Commissioning health services for First Nations, regional, and remote populations: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 25(1). 27–27.

Rush, Amanda, Carol J. Weil, Laura A. Siminoff, et al.. (2024). The Experts Speak: Challenges in Banking Brain Tissue for Research. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 22(2). 179–184. 4 indexed citations

Rush, Amanda, et al.. (2024). A Survey of Community Perceptions on Brain Donation for Research. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 23(1). 31–38.

Rush, Amanda, et al.. (2024). An Approach to Evaluate the Costs and Outputs of Academic Biobanks. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 22(5). 463–474. 1 indexed citations

Rush, Amanda, Peter H. Watson, & Jennifer A. Byrne. (2023). Biobanking and research quality: think locally, act globally. Trends in Genetics. 39(7). 521–523. 1 indexed citations

Byrne, Jennifer A., et al.. (2021). Building Research Support Capacity across Human Health Biobanks during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Biomarker Insights. 16. 3399290596–3399290596. 4 indexed citations

Tarling, Tamsin, et al.. (2021). Vignettes to Illustrate the Value of Tumor Biobanks in Cancer Research in Canada. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 20(1). 75–83. 3 indexed citations

10.

Rush, Amanda & Greg T. Sutherland. (2021). The future of brain banking in Australia: an integrated brain and body biolibrary. The Medical Journal of Australia. 214(10). 447–447. 2 indexed citations

11.

Rush, Amanda, Daniel Catchpoole, Thomas W. Gilbert, et al.. (2021). What Do Biomedical Researchers Want from Biobanks? Results of an Online Survey. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 20(3). 271–282. 11 indexed citations

12.

Rush, Amanda, Daniel Catchpoole, Rod Ling, et al.. (2020). Improving Academic Biobank Value and Sustainability Through an Outputs Focus. Value in Health. 23(8). 1072–1078. 30 indexed citations

13.

Hamilton, Jill B., Zoë Clark, Amanda Rush, et al.. (2019). Awareness of axial spondyloarthritis among chiropractors and osteopaths: findings from a UK Web-based survey. Rheumatology Advances in Practice. 3(2). rkz034–rkz034. 14 indexed citations

14.

Rush, Amanda, Lise Matzke, Simon Cooper, et al.. (2018). Research Perspective on Utilizing and Valuing Tumor Biobanks. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 17(3). 219–229. 27 indexed citations

15.

Campbell, Lori, et al.. (2018). The 2018 Revision of the ISBER Best Practices : Summary of Changes and the Editorial Team's Development Process. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 16(1). 3–6. 89 indexed citations

16.

Matzke, Lise, Candace Carter, Amanda Rush, et al.. (2017). Is Your Biobank Up to Standards? A Review of the National Canadian Tissue Repository Network Required Operational Practice Standards and the Controlled Documents of a Certified Biobank. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 16(1). 36–41. 9 indexed citations

17.

Rush, Amanda, et al.. (2015). Biobank Classification in an Australian Setting. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 13(3). 212–218. 12 indexed citations

18.

Rush, Amanda, Kevin J. Spring, & Jennifer A. Byrne. (2015). A critical analysis of cancer biobank practices in relation to biospecimen quality. Biophysical Reviews. 7(4). 369–378. 11 indexed citations

19.

Rush, Amanda & Jennifer A. Byrne. (2015). Quality and reporting practices in an Australian cancer biobank cohort. Clinical Biochemistry. 49(6). 492–497. 6 indexed citations

20.

Rush, Amanda, Robert Battisti, Belinda Barton, & Daniel Catchpoole. (2015). Opinions of Young Adults on Re-Consenting for Biobanking. The Journal of Pediatrics. 167(4). 925–930. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact