Amanda Piper

540 citations
18 papers · 353 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Piper

18 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Amanda Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Oncology 264
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 184
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 98
  • Otorhinolaryngology 16
  • General Health Professions 81
Replace Ingalill Koinberg with:
Ingalill Koinberg Sweden
J. McPhelim United Kingdom
Nazek Abdelmutti Canada
Mhairi Simpson United Kingdom
Maggie Crowe United Kingdom
Brittany M. Bernardo United States
Pip Youl Australia
Nancy Payeur Canada
Rachid Bekkali Morocco
María Eugenia Jiménez Corona United States
Amanda Piper relative to Ingalill Koinberg Sweden Ingalill Koinberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Ingalill Koinberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Piper. The network helps show where Amanda Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Piper Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2019134
2 202161
3 202048
4 201718
5 201917
6 202016
7 20229
8 20178
9
The state of cancer rehabilitation in Australia
20188
10 20227
11 20167
12 20225
13
A clinical placement program for primary care professionals at a comprehensive cancer centre.
20164
14 20193
15 20163
16 20232
17 20232
18 20171

About Amanda Piper

Amanda Piper is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (264 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (184 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (98 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (16 citations) and General Health Professions (81 citations). Amanda Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Jefford, Karolina Lisy, Jennifer Kent, Peter Brooks, Desmond Yip, Kate Burbury, Leslie Gilham, Craig Underhill, Linda Nolte and Lachlan McDowell. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact