Amanda Miles

447 total citations
10 papers, 314 citations indexed

About

Amanda Miles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Miles has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 314 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Miles's work include Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Amanda Miles is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Amanda Miles collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Amanda Miles's co-authors include Dorthe Berntsen, David C. Rubin, Anne Botzung, Peggy L. St. Jacques, Roberto Cabeza, Simon W. Davis, Shana A. Hall, Erik A. Wing, Kevin S. LaBar and Niels Peter Nielsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology and Aging.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Miles

10 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Miles Denmark	8	211	134	58	55	40	10	314
Joaquín Morís Spain	11	364 1.7×	103 0.8×	101 1.7×	20 0.4×	60 1.5×	36	457
Alicia Smith United Kingdom	6	132 0.6×	35 0.3×	73 1.3×	66 1.2×	35 0.9×	13	263
Kaori Miyawaki Japan	9	443 2.1×	78 0.6×	112 1.9×	28 0.5×	44 1.1×	9	524
Katherine R. Mickley Steinmetz United States	12	338 1.6×	74 0.6×	129 2.2×	37 0.7×	65 1.6×	21	450
Rupa Gupta United States	7	233 1.1×	58 0.4×	79 1.4×	21 0.4×	56 1.4×	10	339
Sonya Dougal United States	7	364 1.7×	100 0.7×	70 1.2×	19 0.3×	96 2.4×	9	440
Annuschka Eden Germany	9	253 1.2×	46 0.3×	133 2.3×	37 0.7×	39 1.0×	10	345
Marieke B.J. Toffolo Netherlands	9	203 1.0×	53 0.4×	209 3.6×	242 4.4×	45 1.1×	17	429
Jessica C. Lee Australia	10	160 0.8×	79 0.6×	66 1.1×	23 0.4×	49 1.2×	33	262
Lisa D. Hager United States	4	352 1.7×	74 0.6×	128 2.2×	40 0.7×	39 1.0×	6	445

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Miles

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Miles

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Miles. The network helps show where Amanda Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Miles. Amanda Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Berntsen, Dorthe, et al.. (2017). Spontaneous or intentional? Involuntary versus voluntary episodic memories in older and younger adults.. Psychology and Aging. 32(2). 192–201. 18 indexed citations

Miles, Amanda & Dorthe Berntsen. (2014). The forgotten remindings: Personal remindings examined through self-probed retrospection during reading and writing. Consciousness and Cognition. 33. 67–77. 3 indexed citations

Hall, Shana A., David C. Rubin, Amanda Miles, et al.. (2014). The Neural Basis of Involuntary Episodic Memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 26(10). 2385–2399. 84 indexed citations

Miles, Amanda, et al.. (2013). Turning back the hands of time: Autobiographical memories in dementia cued by a museum setting. Consciousness and Cognition. 22(3). 1074–1081. 26 indexed citations

Miles, Amanda. (2013). Cuing methodologies in mental time travel. Nordic Psychology. 65(2). 120–136. 2 indexed citations

Miles, Amanda & Dorthe Berntsen. (2011). Odour-induced mental time travel into the past and future: Do odour cues retain a unique link to our distant past?. Memory. 19(8). 930–940. 43 indexed citations

Jacques, Peggy L. St., Anne Botzung, Amanda Miles, & David C. Rubin. (2010). Functional neuroimaging of emotionally intense autobiographical memories in post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 45(5). 630–637. 81 indexed citations

Hess, Thomas M., et al.. (2010). The Impact of Experienced Emotion on Evaluative Judgments: The Effects of Age and Emotion Regulation Style. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 17(6). 648–672. 9 indexed citations

Botzung, Anne, David C. Rubin, Amanda Miles, Roberto Cabeza, & Kevin S. LaBar. (2010). Mental Hoop Diaries: Emotional Memories of a College Basketball Game in Rival Fans. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(6). 2130–2137. 36 indexed citations

10.

Miles, Amanda, et al.. (2010). Understanding the relationship between taste and value in culture and sport. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact