Amanda McLaughlin

11 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Amanda McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Virology 131
  • Infectious Diseases 345
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
  • Epidemiology 266
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 72
Replace Daniel Edson with:
Daniel Edson Australia
Anja Divljan Australia
Alice Broos United States
Brenda van der Heide Australia
Tamika J. Lunn United States
Ahmed Lugelo United Kingdom
William Valderrama United Kingdom
Megan Jones United States
Anna C. Fagre United States
Oscar Rico‐Chávez Mexico
Amanda McLaughlin relative to Daniel Edson Australia Daniel Edson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Edson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda McLaughlin. The network helps show where Amanda McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together Amanda McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2008104
2 2011101
3 201583
4 201333
5 201533
6 201532
7 201931
8 200723
9 201616
10 201611
11 20185
12
Helicopter Parenting in Higher Education: A Content Analysis of Parental Involvement As Discussed in the Media
20200

About Amanda McLaughlin

Amanda McLaughlin is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Virology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virology and Viral Diseases (10 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (10 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (8 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (131 citations), Infectious Diseases (345 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (166 citations), Epidemiology (266 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (72 citations). Amanda McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hume Field, Craig Smith, Daniel Edson, Alice Broos, Carol de Jong, Nina Kung, Andrew A. Cunningham, Jonathan H. Epstein, Peter Daszak and Lee McMichael. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Epidemiology and Infection, One Health, EcoHealth and Emerging infectious diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact