Amanda K. Robinson
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. CarlsonTijl GrootswagersMarlene BehrmannPulkit GroverPraveen VenkateshMatthew J. BoringMichael J. TarrJason B. Mattingley
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (16 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda K. Robinson
29 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Cognitive Neuroscience 412
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
- Social Psychology 66
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 57
- Molecular Biology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda K. Robinson
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda K. Robinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda K. Robinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda K. Robinson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda K. Robinson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda K. Robinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda K. Robinson. The network helps show where Amanda K. Robinson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda K. Robinson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda K. Robinson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda K. Robinson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda K. Robinson. Amanda K. Robinson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 256 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | Do Snakes Use Olfactory Receptors in the Nose to Detect Odors?: A Prediction Based on the Percentage of Nonfunctional Olfactory Receptor Genes Amplified in Four Species of Snakes | 2 |
About Amanda K. Robinson
Amanda K. Robinson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (16 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (412 citations), Sensory Systems (44 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations). Amanda K. Robinson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Carlson, Tijl Grootswagers, Marlene Behrmann, Pulkit Grover, Praveen Venkatesh, Matthew J. Boring, Michael J. Tarr, Jason B. Mattingley, Judith Reinhard and Anina N. Rich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.