Amanda J. McLaughlin

417 total citations
7 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

Amanda J. McLaughlin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda J. McLaughlin has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Amanda J. McLaughlin's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). Amanda J. McLaughlin is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). Amanda J. McLaughlin collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Amanda J. McLaughlin's co-authors include Gautam B. Awatramani, David J. Schwab, Stuart Trenholm, Santhosh Sethuramanujam, Robert G. Smith, Fred Rieke, Maxwell H. Turner, Kevin L. Briggman, Kara Ronellenfitch and Jon Cafaro and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Amanda J. McLaughlin

7 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda J. McLaughlin United States	7	211	195	127	14	10	7	261
Deborah Langrill Beaudoin United States	7	257 1.2×	262 1.3×	140 1.1×	14 1.0×	10 1.0×	11	366
Hartwig Seitter Austria	8	167 0.8×	198 1.0×	93 0.7×	44 3.1×	8 0.8×	10	279
Fiona E. Müllner Germany	5	169 0.8×	129 0.7×	117 0.9×	8 0.6×	14 1.4×	7	255
Nai-Wen Tien United States	6	154 0.7×	167 0.9×	70 0.6×	13 0.9×	7 0.7×	8	223
Soon Keen Cheong Australia	9	126 0.6×	157 0.8×	229 1.8×	14 1.0×	7 0.7×	15	295
Alex Fratzl Switzerland	6	135 0.6×	85 0.4×	128 1.0×	16 1.1×	10 1.0×	8	198
Antonia Drinnenberg Switzerland	4	157 0.7×	194 1.0×	123 1.0×	9 0.6×	8 0.8×	4	261
Naoko Omi Japan	6	229 1.1×	260 1.3×	72 0.6×	12 0.9×	9 0.9×	9	286
Doug Bland United States	3	99 0.5×	115 0.6×	45 0.4×	14 1.0×	5 0.5×	3	165
Karl Klug United States	5	158 0.7×	236 1.2×	154 1.2×	11 0.8×	6 0.6×	8	314

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda J. McLaughlin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda J. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda J. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda J. McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda J. McLaughlin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda J. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda J. McLaughlin. The network helps show where Amanda J. McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda J. McLaughlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda J. McLaughlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda J. McLaughlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda J. McLaughlin. Amanda J. McLaughlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

McLaughlin, Amanda J., et al.. (2023). An ON-type direction-selective ganglion cell in primate retina. Nature. 623(7986). 381–386. 13 indexed citations

McLaughlin, Amanda J., Kumiko A. Percival, Jacqueline Gayet‐Primo, & Teresa Puthussery. (2020). Glycinergic Inhibition Targets Specific Off Cone Bipolar Cells in Primate Retina. eNeuro. 8(1). ENEURO.0432–20.2020. 6 indexed citations

Cafaro, Jon, Amanda J. McLaughlin, Friso R. Postma, et al.. (2018). Gap Junctions Contribute to Differential Light Adaptation across Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells. Neuron. 100(1). 216–228.e6. 34 indexed citations

Sethuramanujam, Santhosh, et al.. (2016). A Central Role for Mixed Acetylcholine/GABA Transmission in Direction Coding in the Retina. Neuron. 90(6). 1243–1256. 62 indexed citations

McLaughlin, Amanda J., Kara Ronellenfitch, Stuart Trenholm, et al.. (2015). Specific Wiring of Distinct Amacrine Cells in the Directionally Selective Retinal Circuit Permits Independent Coding of Direction and Size. Neuron. 86(1). 276–291. 52 indexed citations

Trenholm, Stuart, Amanda J. McLaughlin, David J. Schwab, et al.. (2014). Nonlinear dendritic integration of electrical and chemical synaptic inputs drives fine-scale correlations. Nature Neuroscience. 17(12). 1759–1766. 59 indexed citations

Trenholm, Stuart, Amanda J. McLaughlin, David J. Schwab, & Gautam B. Awatramani. (2013). Dynamic Tuning of Electrical and Chemical Synaptic Transmission in a Network of Motion Coding Retinal Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(37). 14927–14938. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact