Nai-Wen Tien

430 total citations
8 papers, 223 citations indexed

About

Nai-Wen Tien is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Nai-Wen Tien has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 223 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Nai-Wen Tien's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). Nai-Wen Tien is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). Nai-Wen Tien collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Bulgaria. Nai-Wen Tien's co-authors include Daniel Kerschensteiner, Florentina Soto, Tahnbee Kim, James T. Pearson, Jay Demas, Oliver I. Wagner, Gong‐Her Wu, Ning Shen, Robert E. Johnson and Yi Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Nature Communications and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Nai-Wen Tien

8 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nai-Wen Tien United States	6	167	154	70	18	16	8	223
Xiaonan Richard Sun United States	4	93 0.6×	129 0.8×	59 0.8×	12 0.7×	6 0.4×	7	231
Marion Russeau France	6	117 0.7×	130 0.8×	27 0.4×	16 0.9×	13 0.8×	11	222
Danai Katsanevaki United Kingdom	4	101 0.6×	78 0.5×	149 2.1×	17 0.9×	4 0.3×	6	243
Jinye Dai United States	7	134 0.8×	167 1.1×	57 0.8×	39 2.2×	4 0.3×	11	272
Harold M. McNamara United States	9	129 0.8×	170 1.1×	94 1.3×	17 0.9×	5 0.3×	10	274
Baptiste Libé‐Philippot Belgium	4	132 0.8×	62 0.4×	34 0.5×	10 0.6×	10 0.6×	5	193
Rosy Joshi‐Mukherjee United States	9	361 2.2×	139 0.9×	16 0.2×	12 0.7×	3 0.2×	16	460
Doug Bland United States	3	115 0.7×	99 0.6×	45 0.6×	16 0.9×	3 0.2×	3	165
Marissa Sorek Germany	2	114 0.7×	98 0.6×	43 0.6×	15 0.8×	3 0.2×	2	161
James C. R. Grove United States	8	147 0.9×	153 1.0×	58 0.8×	8 0.4×	2 0.1×	9	250

Countries citing papers authored by Nai-Wen Tien

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nai-Wen Tien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nai-Wen Tien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nai-Wen Tien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nai-Wen Tien

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nai-Wen Tien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nai-Wen Tien. The network helps show where Nai-Wen Tien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nai-Wen Tien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nai-Wen Tien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nai-Wen Tien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nai-Wen Tien. Nai-Wen Tien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Tien, Nai-Wen, Yan Ma, Kai Zhang, et al.. (2024). A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory. Nature Communications. 15(1). 1457–1457. 5 indexed citations

2.

Chen, Susu, Yi Liu, Jennifer Colonell, et al.. (2024). Brain-wide neural activity underlying memory-guided movement. Cell. 187(3). 676–691.e16. 26 indexed citations

3.

Tien, Nai-Wen, et al.. (2022). Layer-Specific Developmentally Precise Axon Targeting of Transient Suppressed-by-Contrast Retinal Ganglion Cells. Journal of Neuroscience. 42(38). 7213–7221. 4 indexed citations

4.

Tien, Nai-Wen, Florentina Soto, & Daniel Kerschensteiner. (2017). Homeostatic Plasticity Shapes Cell-Type-Specific Wiring in the Retina. Neuron. 94(3). 656–665.e4. 42 indexed citations

5.

Johnson, Robert E., Nai-Wen Tien, Ning Shen, et al.. (2017). Homeostatic plasticity shapes the visual system’s first synapse. Nature Communications. 8(1). 1220–1220. 23 indexed citations

6.

Tien, Nai-Wen, Tahnbee Kim, & Daniel Kerschensteiner. (2016). Target-Specific Glycinergic Transmission from VGluT3-Expressing Amacrine Cells Shapes Suppressive Contrast Responses in the Retina. Cell Reports. 15(7). 1369–1375. 50 indexed citations

7.

Tien, Nai-Wen, et al.. (2015). Genetically Identified Suppressed-by-Contrast Retinal Ganglion Cells Reliably Signal Self-Generated Visual Stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(30). 10815–10820. 44 indexed citations

8.

Tien, Nai-Wen, et al.. (2011). Tau/PTL-1 associates with kinesin-3 KIF1A/UNC-104 and affects the motor's motility characteristics in C. elegans neurons. Neurobiology of Disease. 43(2). 495–506. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact