Amanda Haigh
About
In The Last Decade
Amanda Haigh
9 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Immunology 163
- Global and Planetary Change 101
- Ecological Modeling 71
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 61
- Ecology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Haigh
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Haigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Haigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Haigh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Haigh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Haigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Haigh. The network helps show where Amanda Haigh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Haigh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Haigh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Haigh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Haigh. Amanda Haigh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Conservation status of New Zealand frogs, 2013 | 6 |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 59 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 188 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.